BROADCASTING
AND DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF ZAMBIA
Ben
Kangwa
Master
of Arts (M.A.) Journalism
University
of Wales
September
1994
BROADCASTING
AND DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF ZAMBIA
By
Ben
Kangwa
A
thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements
for
the degree of Master of Arts (Journalism
Studies) at
the
University of Wales, Cardiff.
September
1994
DEDICATION
To my wife AWONGO, my son MWILA and my daughter
CHIMWEMWE, with deepest love and memory
DECLARATION
I declare that this dissertation is the result of my
independent investigation and that due reference is made where necessary to the
work of other researchers as acknowledged in the notes, references and
appendices.
I further declare that this work has not already been
accepted in substance for any degree,
and is not concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree.
------------------------------------
BEN KANGWA
1ST September 1994
(Supervisor) GEOFF MUNGHAM
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Geoff
Mungham, Director of Research at the Centre for Journalism and my academic
Supervisor is gratefully acknowledged for his unflagging guidance and great
patience in structuring my research and pointing me in the right direction at
all stages of this project.
Mr.
Kevin Williams, lecturer at the Centre also deserves my thanks for his
sustained encouragement which inspired me to study hard and to be confident
enough to complete this work.
I
also wish to express my appreciation to the former Zambia National Broadcasting
Corporation (ZNBC) Director-General, Dr. Manasseh Phiri, Dr. Graham Mytton, Mr.
Peter Fraenkel and Mr. Michael Kittermaster for their wonderful assistance. The late Mann Sichalwe, former Director of
the Zambia Institute of Mass Communications (ZAMCOM), the late Mark Mbewe,
former Director of the Zambia National Archives are also remembered for their
generous help and encouragement before my course of study.
Finally,
my special gratitude to my wife, Awongo, who visited me three times during my
academic year at the University of Wales.
Without her understanding and encouragement, I could not have worked and
studied wherever I went. And without her
support and love, I could not have overcome all the difficulties to achieve
whatever I attempted.
ABSTRACT
This dissertation aims to study development and
broadcasting in Zambia, to draw conclusions as to the present situation of
broadcasting and the direction it should move in future.
The study of the development of broadcasting in Zambia
and its current structure are outlined together with details of its structure,
policy and the constraints upon it.
The findings of this study show that broadcasting, radio
in particular, has become the dominant news source for the nation, an effective
instrument of propaganda for the government and a powerful influence in the
political, social, economic and cultural life of the Zambian people.
Finally, some suggestions are put forward for ways of
improving the content and presentation of programmes on both radio and
television and for reform of the current media system in Zambia.
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
DEDICATION i
DECLARATION ii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii
ABSTRACT v
MAP OF ZAMBIA vi
INTRODUCTION 1
CHAPTER ONE 4
MASS MEDIA, COMMUNICATION
AND DEVELOPMENT 4
ELECTRONIC MEDIA: ZAMBIA 10
IMPACT OF RADIO 20
CHAPTER TWO 24
HISTORICAL AND
GEOGRAPHICAL BACKGROUND 24
COLONIAL RULE 26
POPULATION AND PEOPLE 31
CROWN COLONY POLITICS 34
THE INFLUENCE OF THE BBC
EMPIRE SERVICE 39
ON THE DEVELOPMENT OF
LOCAL COLONIAL
BROADCASTING
CHAPTER THREE 61
THE NORTHERN RHODESIA
INFORMATION 61
DEPARTMENT
THE FIRST RADIO STATION 70
CABS AND THE SAUCEPAN
SPECIAL 77
CHAPTER FOUR 90
ZNBC STRUCTURE AND POLICY
OBJECTIVES 90
POLITICAL INTERFERENCE 93
CURRENT FINANCIAL
SITUATION 102
RADIO AUDIENCE AND
RESEARCH 106
POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS 114
CONCLUSION 116
APPENDIX I 122
APPENDIX II 123
BIBLIOGRAPHY 124
|
INTRODUCTION
In 1982, the government of
Zambia embarked upon a programme to revitalize the mass media, when the then
President, Kenneth Kaunda inaugurated the new Mass Media Complex in
Lusaka. In his address, Kaunda
emphasized:
‘Every
one of us has a right to speak and a right to be heard. What everybody else is
saying and doing affects everybody else’s
life struggle and personal opportunities…. This Complex we are now
commissioning is cardinal instrument in this vital process of rebuilding our
personal lives….. ‘(Kaunda, K, 1982.)
The government had
committed itself to the promise that development depends upon adequate
communication processes and a two way flow of information. However, the completion of the Mass Media
Complex, while providing a level of production facilities for radio and
television which were among the best in Africa, only began a longer term
process which would ultimately allow information to pass freely throughout the
country, especially into the heart of its rural communities.
What was achieved initially
primarily benefited urban audiences and has been constrained by problems of
manpower, the replacement of equipment and equipment spares, created by
inadequate funding and other problems arising from the country’s general
economic difficulties.
This dissertation is made
up of four chapters as follows:
CHAPTER ONE:
analyses the role of the Mass Media, Communication and Development in
the Developing Countries. The study
attempts to give a general overview of the mass media and communication through
a literature review.
CHAPTER TWO:
traces and summarizes the political background of Zambia and examines
the British government’s policy on Colonial Broadcasting before the Second
World War. The role played by the
British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) in its Empire Service is also discussed.
CHAPTER ___THREE:
is devoted to discussing the development of radio in Northern Rhodesia
after the Second World War and how the Colonial Government used the medium to
‘socialize’ the Africans. The development
of other media – television and newspapers, has only been referred to in
passing and could be the subject of another study.
CHAPTER FOUR: which concludes the dissertation assesses
the performance of Radio in relation to development with some suggested policy
recommendations for both the Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation (ZNBC)
and the government.
Source materials for this
study are from textbooks, newspapers, journals, magazines, government reports
and interviews with people connected with the Northern Rhodesia Broadcasting
Corporation (NRBC), Zambia Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC), Zambia Broadcasting
Services (ZBS) and the Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation (ZNBC) as well
as my personal experience as a broadcast journalist for fifteen years.
CHAPTER ONE
MASS MEDIA,
COMMUNICATION AND DEVELOPMENT
‘Development’ is usually
referred to by quantifiable indicators such as Gross National Product (GNP) and
per capita income in traditional Social Science literature.
But now instead of
becoming a synonym for economic growth, development is seen more in rounded
terms – which brings into consideration questions of distributive justice,
human fulfilment and cultural identity.
(Dissanayeke, W, 1985, p21).
In the past, the mass
media, especially radio, were penetrating further into the mass audience of
developing countries and seemed to have a considerable potential for helping
such nations to reach development goals.
Communication scholars
were being attracted to study development problems in education, agriculture,
politics and family planning.
Thus literacy, ideological
orientation and political participation constituted real issues for most
developing countries espousing a policy of media use for national development.
One of Africa’s leading
critics and theorists of the mass media, Cehn Chimutengwende (1992) notes:
‘The
mass media have long been
recognized
in developing countries
as
essential auxiliary means of
modern
economic construction, social
and
cultural development. They are
important
means of social control and
social
process. Their ideological and
socialization
functions are continually being defined and perfected in developing countries
as one of the indispensable factors in the mobilization of general population
for programmes of national development. ‘(Chimutengwende, quoted in Ziegler and
Asante, 1992, p41)
Chimutengwende recognizes
the importance developing countries place on the media. He sees the necessity for planned and guided
development and believes that this is mot consonant to the present conditions
of those nations.
In the early communication
research tradition led by Everett Rogers, Wilbur Schramm and Daniel Lerner
during the 1960s, modern communication media were idealized as powerful instruments
for achieving the announced goals of socio-economic modernization, national
integration and cultural expression.
Rogers, particularly,
focused attention on development and its relationship to communication. Rogers has insisted:
‘The
newer conceptions of development imply a different and generally, wider role
for communication. (Rogers, 1976, p8)
In many development
efforts where information has been used, communication activities alone have
been relied on to provide the impetus for change. Skillful communication, for instance, can
change peasants’ perceptions of their situation, but it alone cannot change the
situation very much.
‘It
can help a backward farmer to see opportunities he ignores, but if
opportunities do not exist, information will not create them.’ (Brown and Kearl, 1967, p25)
In the 1950s and 1960s,
there was much optimism and high hopes for the role that mass communication
might play in fostering development in developing countries. Hedebro, G, (1980) sums up the following
major functions that communication was supposed to fulfill:
- teach new skills from literacy to agriculture and hygiene.
- act as multipliers of resources of knowledge.
- raise levels of aspirations which in turn would act as
incentives for action.
- make people more prone to participate in decision-making.
- facilitate the planning and implementation of development programmes that will correspond to the
needs of the population.
- make economic, social and political development a
self-perpetuating process.
- create a sense of nationhood.
These various points
express the firm belief of the time that communication could contribute in an
important way to the striving for improved living conditions.
Some authors even used
terms as ‘magic multipliers’ in describing the media and what they could do in
the development process. (Mytton, 1983, p27)
Against this background,
communication was seen as an indispensable tool for making the people of
under-developed societies more modern.
During the 1940s and
1950s, the dominant paradigm emphasized the need for rapid economic growth by
means of industrialization. Heavy
emphasis was placed on capital intensive technology and centralized planning.
The communication scholars
who were in favour of this approach, such as Scramm (1963-1964), Lerner (1958),
Pye (1963) and Pool (1963) had profound influence through their writings in
winning recognition for an approach which argued that the only way in which
less developed countries could progress was by emulating the industrially
advanced countries and taking the same historical path they had travelled.
(Beltran, S, 1976).
The dominant paradigm also
envisaged communication as a flow of messages that travelled only one way from
top (government) to bottom (the people) – a process of ‘conveying information
and persuasive messages from government to a public in a downward hierarchical
way. (Rogers, 1976, p133).
Media channels including
broadcast technology when possible and change agents when not, were used to
inform and persuade the people about development projects. The people were assigned the passive role of
acquiescing to appeals for social change.
(Narula and Pearce, 1986).
Despite considerable
research, the relative power of the mass media and communication in leading to
development was mainly assumed rather than proven. Sinclair notes that:
‘The
failure of the media to bring about the instant modernization which the
paradigm promised, compounded with the more general failure of “economic
development” policies over the so called “development decade” of the 1960s led
to critical re-evaluations in every quarter of the media’s relation to economic
development. (Sinclair, 1982, p286).
Communication researchers
also began to question some of their prior assumptions, becoming especially
critical of earlier neglect of the content of mass media, the need for social
structural changes in addition to communication, if development were to
occur. And the shortcomings of the
classical ‘diffusion – of – innovations’ viewpoint which had become an
important explanation for development.
By 1976, Everett Rogers
had acknowledged that the ‘dominant paradigm’ of development/modernization has
‘passed’. In fact it still survived in a
greatly modified form, as in a study by Katz and Wedell which is still
concerned with ‘the problems of harnessing broadcasting to national
development’. (Katz and Wedell, 1978, p
vi).
ELECTRONIC MEDIA: ZAMBIA
In a developing country
like Zambia, the mass media is one of the most widely used forms of communication. Decision makers have long understood the
importance of the mass media, particularly radio, in providing an instantaneous
means of reaching a large segment of the population be it for mobilizing
purposes, national emergencies or for transmitting diverse kinds of messages.
But before considering the
role and place of radio in Zambia, it is important to underline the realities
of life in the developing countries. The
salient features are low literacy rates, low per capita incomes and an average
life expectancy of almost half of the developed states. In addition, developing countries are
characterized by rampant poverty and disease.
Mwakawago (1986) says:
‘Although
the death rate is high, population growth is phenomenal. The population of Africa will double by the
year 2000 but food production will not match population growth. There will be more mouths to feed than food
to feed them’. (Quoted in Wedell, 1986,
p82).
The majority of the
developing countries are producers of raw materials and consumers of finished
products from the developed states. That
means they are on the periphery of the world economic stage.
Such is the gloomy picture
which of necessity has to be taken into consideration in discussing the role of
radio, and indeed other mass media in development. Yet, to quote from Mwakawago (1986) again:
‘…inspite
of this gloomy picture, there are some very significant, positive aspects in
the developing countries. Their
potential for development, especially in agricultural field and mineral
exploitation is tremendous’. (Quoted in
Wedell, 1986, p83).
In Zambia many people have
not had the opportunity of a full education and some are unable to read or
write. The World Bank (1990) Report
indicates that the illiteracy rate in Zambia is 56.9%. 32.6% of this comprises females and 24.3% of
males above the age of 15. Thus radio is
extensively used especially for educational purposes. It is also used for other purposes as in
agriculture. Radio programmes produced
by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Fisheries continue with a fourteen
hour total time per week in the seven mail languages plus English. These are:-
- Radio Farm Forum – a thirty minute discussion
programme broadcast once a week.
- Zambian Land and the People – a fifteen minute
programme in English of a documentary nature usually covering successful
farming activities.
- Farm Magazine – a weekly fifteen minute magazine
programme in English aimed at large-scale commercial farmers and agricultural
policy-makers. It contains agricultural
news and interviews and often includes foreign inserts. Organizations supplying such foreign inserts
include the Canadian Farm Forum Network, the Voice of America and the United
Nations Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO).
- Farmer’s Notebook – a fifteen minute weekly programme
based on the farming calendar and providing advice for that week.
- Rural Notebook – broadcast twice daily except Sundays,
providing special advice on what farmers should watch out for.
- Rural Development Corner – a weekly ten minute
programme in English which highlights various development projects in the
country. It is directed towards farmers
and the general public.
With regard to television,
Lima Time is broadcast on a weekly basis, at peak viewing time (20.00
hours on Thursdays).
Most Lima Time programmes
are of a general documentary nature about agriculture, and take into account
that most television receivers are in urban rather than rural areas.
Radio programmes with a
health and nutrition content are produced by the Ministry of Health and the
National Food and Nutrition Commission and consist mainly of short, two-to-four
minute inserts which are played at various times of the week during music
programmes – mostly at peak listening times in the morning. Some of the programmes take the form of a
dramatic dialogue between two actors, one perhaps acting as a mother with badly
nourished children; the other as a nurse, medical assistant, or simply a friend
with advice to offer. The episodes are
scripted which tends to make them sound contrived and unreal.
Items on health, nutrition
and child care are also included in the women’s programmes, produced by the
Women’s Section. Until the late 1970s,
these programmes had a high degree of field-recorded content, obtained through
close co-operation with the Ministry of Community Development.
In the process of
recording interviews in the villages, local recipes were collected, which were
later printed as a cookbook and used by the Community Development Officers.
In the area of population,
some efforts were made in the early 1970s to include information on the
negative effects of urbanization. Thus Malikopo
(a Tonga language programme), has the hero advising people in urban areas whose
income is very low to go back to the land.
Until very recently, however, the general attitude towards population issues
and family planning in particular, has been largely negative, at times even
hostile. Since the late 1980s however,
government and public attitudes have shown a positive shift, as reflected in
the news and topical coverage of the media.
Health and population is
perhaps the most diverse of the development sectors in terms of media user
groups. Several government and
non-governmental bodies, as well as international and bilateral organizations
are involved in health and population activities which are already or could, in
one way of another, be supported by broadcasting.
In the Ministry of Health,
the Health Education Unit is responsible for organizing and co-ordinating media
support of primary health care, including child immunization, diarrhea control,
AIDS, nutrition, family health and planning.
On television, ‘Doctor’s Diary’ a panel discussion programme, was
initiated in March 1987, discontinued at the end of October the same year, but
later resumed in early 1989 under a restructured format. The programme was presented by the former
Director-General of the Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation (ZNBC) then
Nkana Mine Hospital Medical Superintendent, Dr. Manasseh Phiri until December
1990. Panelists were drawn from both
health personnel and Non-Governmental Organizations (NGOs). More than fifteen programmes have dealt with
AIDS, which is still a major preoccupation of the Ministry of Health. ‘Palaver’ is another youth panel
discussion television programme which recently featured a discussion mainly on
AIDS. It was broadcast every Thursday
between October 1992 to June 1993 at 18.00 hours.
Apart from functional
literacy, academic programmes are also produced for schools and the Educational
Broadcasting Services (EBS) was introduced in 1965 solely for this
purpose. On gaining independence, Zambia
chose to provide free education for all children. This put considerable strain on existing educational
facilities both in terms of the availability of teachers and school
places. The use of educational media,
that is, educational radio and television, was seen as a method of supporting
existing educational provision which could reach pupils both in the existing
formal school system and those in the growing non-formal system. It was also seen as a means of preventing
discrimination between the advantaged urban population and those living in the
more remote rural areas. It would ensure
access of information and would expose the whole country to improved teaching
methods and educational materials of standard, good quality.
Regrettably, most of these
programmes have not fully succeeded as their content has either been rendered
stale by changing events or lack of funds for updating them. Apart from this, radio sets distributed to
schools for pupils have either been stolen or have fallen into a state of
disrepair.
The media is also called
upon to assist in fostering a sense of national identity among linguistic
groups who do not share the same customs or cosmology. In the light of boundaries inherited from the
colonialists, Zambia finds herself in a situation in which some of her people
on the border areas have relatives in neighbouring countries. For instance some of the Tongas are to be
found in Zimbabwe, some Lozis in Botswana, some Lundas in Angola, some Bembas
in Zaire, some Tumbukas, Chewas and Ngonis in Malawi. In the fight against colonial rule this had,
in itself, delayed the independence of Zambia.
Thus the media, and especially radio, was expected to keep the national
question burning lest people turned from nationalism to ethnic identification.
There was therefore need
for national integration. Nationhood was
a new phenomenon. It could not be taken
for granted. It had to be built. It meant welding together many tribes, races
and ethnic groups. Thus “our country,
our government”, plus the symbolism of statehood such as the “national leader,
the national flag and the national anthem” became the focus of loyalty in place
of the tribal chief and the village headmen.
Thus it is not surprising
that the radio signal was heavily loaded with nationalist messages. Radio helps in the creation and enhancement
of the new identity of people. Radio
also creates a sense of belonging as well as a sense of participation in the
achievements of the new state (Mwakawango, 1986, p83).
After gaining independence
from Britain in 1964, Zambia persistently tried to discourage tribalism by
embarking on vigorous a campaign for a “One Zambia, One Nation”. This slogan preceded every news bulletin on
radio and television and became a national motto and was shouted by politicians
at rallies to a resounding response by the people. In the national anthem there is also a
phrase, ‘One Zambia, One nation is our cry…’
All this adds up to an
important role for communication in national development, policy making and
planning. But in order to do this, a
powerful medium is required to make the population willing to undertake the
effort involved. Thus radio becomes the
natural choice.
IMPACT OF RADIO
Mwakawango (1986) says:
‘Even
a small radio set can be listened to at any one moment by a group of
individuals without jostling. With a
newspaper even two people cannot read a single copy comfortably. The multiplier effect in radio is quite
evident. Therefore, to the policy maker
the radio is a very powerful instrument’.
(Quoted in Wedell, 1986, p86)
Given the poor transport
facilities in Zambia, it is not possible to rely on face-to-face contact. Literacy is low and consequently, newspapers
or the written word cannot be the chief means of communication. Television would be ideal. But this medium is extremely expensive to
acquire and to run. What remains
therefore is the radio.
And with the technological
revolution that has taken place over the last thirty years, the radio is still
relatively cheap in Zambia and because of that, it can be purchased by most
people.
As a result of its wide
coverage of distance radio can also play a major role in carrying information
to a national audience.
It will be remembered that
in Zambia, radio is used extensively in educational programmes and is one
effective way of eradicating illiteracy, poverty and disease. It is also used to inform people of what is
happening in and outside Zambia, so that better informed Zambians can made
rational decisions affecting their lives.
Globally, it has the
largest audience of any mass medium. Put
into figures, there are about two billion radio sets worldwide. That is one for every four persons.
‘In
Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa, there is one radio for every ten people. In rural Pakistan over 50% of the households
have radios while in Egypt it is around 85%’ (Population Reports, 1986, p854)
However, Africa possesses
fewer facilities per head of population than any other continent.
Mytton (1983) argues that
the number of radio receivers in Africa tell us little and ‘we should be
careful in making assumptions based on such evidence.’ The world distribution of radio receivers for
example in 1976 was:
North America – 48%
Europe – 30%
Asia – 12%
America South – 6%
Africa – 3.1%
Oceania – 1.4% (Mytton,
1983, p 23)
By 1987 radio facilities
had marginally risen in some poorer regions, and to some extent, have declined
in the north:
Africa 3.4%
Asia – 27.7%
North America – 29%
Europe and USSR – 28.3%
Latin America – 7.5%
(UNESCO Statistical Year Book, 1989)
Against this background,
radio reaches about 80% of the world’s population. The Population Reports (1986) summarizes as
follows:
‘There
are an estimated 1,600 million radio receivers – and nearly 32,000 radio
stations’. (Population Reports, 1986, p
854)
The next chapter examines
the evolution of the historical, cultural, political and economic background of
Zambia. The Policy on Colonial
Broadcasting imposed by the British government before the Second World War also
leads into a discussion on the role played by the BBC through its Empire
Service.
CHAPTER TWO
HISTORICAL
AND GEOGRAPHICAL BACKGROUND
A strangely shaped
country, Zambia is one of Africa’s most eccentric legacies of colonialism. Its borders do not correspond to any single
or complete tribal or linguistic area, or to the boundaries of any organized
society which existed prior to the arrival of the Europeans.
As a result, regionalism
constantly threatens to tear the country apart.
This regionalism was one of the main reasons why the former president
Kenneth Kaunda, declared a one party state in 1972, though like many other
African presidents of that era, he also conveniently used it to consolidate his
supremacy over the political machinery of the country.
Armed with such power,
Kaunda became not only head of the government and the sole legal political
party, the United National Independence Party (UNIP), but commander of the
armed forces.
He also used his
prerogative to order the arrest and indefinite detention of anyone he regarded
as a threat. With the winds of change
blowing through Africa in the 1990s, however, coupled with the country’s
disastrous economic woes, something was bound to give sooner or later.
Following violent street
protests against increased food prices in mid-1990, which quickly transformed
into a general demand for the return of multi-party politics, Kaunda was forced
to bow to public opinion.
Even so, he attempted to
head this off with a snap referendum in late 1990. But as protests grew more vocal, he was
forced to cancel this, amend the constitution, legalize opposition parties and
set elections for October, 1991. In
these elections he was defeated and replaced by Frederick Chiluba, the former
Chairman of the Zambia Congress of Trade Unions (ZCTU).
The political changes are
certainly welcome; and since the new government has committed itself to good
governance, transparency and accountability, it remains to be seen whether this
will result in Zambia being better placed to address its economic woes.
During the 1980s, Zambia
acquired a reputation among donors including the International Monetary Fund
(IMF) and the World Bank as a bad repayment risk, and so far Chiluba’s Movement
for Multi-Party Democracy (MMD) has been trying its best to manoeuvre to seek
debt rescheduling, maintain a good flow of aid and restructure industry. It will inevitably mean many more years of
austerity for a long suffering population which has already suffered more than
it can handle.
COLONIAL RULE
Known before Independence
as Northern Rhodesia, Zambia was largely the creation of Cecil Rhodes’ British
South Africa Company (BSA Company). The
company laid claim to this part of Africa in the 1890s.
Rhodes’ purpose in coming
was to search for minerals and recruit cheap labour for South African and
Rhodesian mines and plantations.
The new colony was slow to
develop, even though a railway had been pushed through the territory to the
copper mines of Katanga by 1910 and a lead and zinc mine had opened up at
Kabwe, formerly known as Broken Hill.
In the late 1920s,
however, vast deposits of copper ore were discovered on the Katangan border and
by 1940 the mines employed 30,000 workers.
Kasoma (1986) notes: ‘By 1930, there were more than 30,000 Africans
employed on the Copperbelt. The mines
also attracted numerous Whites. Many of
these Whites were Afrikaans from South Africa.
(Kasoma, 1986, p11).
Migrant labour became a
major feature of the country and with the imposition of taxes and commercial
farming by White settlers on land appropriated from the local people, it was
almost obligatory for families in the centre and south of the colony.
The colony was put under
direct British control in 1924. Not long
after that the white settlers began to agitate for Federation with Southern
Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) in order to consolidate their political control over
the country.
The Federation did not
come about until 1953. The Federation
was seen clearly by African nationalists for what it really was and mass
demonstrations followed.
Considerable pressure was
put on the British government to end the Federation and grant independence, but
this took 11 years.
The colonial authorities
and their supporters were not keen to see this happen. By the time of independence, the British
South Africa Company had extracted some £80 million in royalties
from ‘ownership’ of the mineral resources.
The British Treasury had collected about £50 million in taxes, yet
spent only £5 million on the colony.
At the same time, some £100 million of wealth
created by Northern Rhodesia had been spent or invested in Southern Rhodesia in
the 10 years of Federation. Zambia still
suffers from the effects of this staggering loss of capital and lack of
investment.
Kenneth Kaunda, the
country’s sole president from independence in 1964 until 1991, was, like
Nyerere of Tanzania and Nkrumah of Ghana, one of that breed of early African
politicians whose commitment to the liberation of the continent from
colonialism and white domination superceded almost everything else.
Throughout his long
presidency, he variously supported, regardless of the cost to his own country,
FRELIMO (or Mozambique), SWAPO (of Namibia) both wings of the ZIMBABWE
PATRIOTIC FRONT (ZAPU, led by Joshua Nkomo and ZANU led by Robert Mugabe) and
the AFRICA NATIONAL CONGRESS (ANC of South Africa).
This support did indeed cost
Zambia dearly, one of the reasons being that, until the construction of the
Tazara Railway line from Dar-es-salaam (Tanzania) to Kapiri Mposhi, Zambia was
entirely dependent on the railway systems of Angola, Mozambique, what was then
Rhodesia, and South Africa to get exports to the coast and bring in imports.
While few doubted Kaunda’s
sincerity on this score, the country was ill-placed to fund such confrontation
plus it was also clearly a convenient external issue with which to divert
attention from Zambia’s increasingly serious internal problems.
Not only did Kaunda’s
support for these liberation movements frequently threaten Zambia with
financial ruin and near famine but, on occasions, it led to serious internal
security problems.
The most serious threat
came from the Smith-Muzorewa regime which, in October 1978, began a determined
campaign of sabotage and military intimidation.
Virtually all roads and railways, (except one through Zimbabwe-Rhodesia
which Zambia depended on for exporting copper and bringing in supplies) had
been knocked out.
The final turn of the
screw came with the announcement that 300,000 tonnes of maize which had been
brought from South Africa to head off a threatened famine could not be
transported through Zimbabwe-Rhodesia until Kaunda stopped supporting
ZAPU. A massive airlift was mounted by
various Western nations but the situation was really only save some months
later in April 1980 when Zimbabwe became independent.
Although Kaunda was then
able to take Zambia off a war footing, all those years of sacrifice, fears of
armed intervention, saboteurs and spies had left their mark. The economy was on the brink of collapse,
foreign exchange reserves were almost exhausted, there were serious shortages
of food, fuel and other basic commodities, and both the crime and unemployment
rates had risen sharply.
In 1986 an attempt was
made to diversify the economy and do something about the country’s balance of
payments by withdrawing basic food subsidies and fixing the Kwacha’s rate of exchange
by holding a weekly auction. The
resultant food price rises led to serious country-wide riots in which many
people lost their lives, forcing Kaunda to restore subsidies.
To some degree, the
restoration of food price controls succeeded in containing social and political
unrest but it led to a break with the IMF over nonpayment of short-term loans
and this, in turn, plunged Zambia into yet another debt crisis. The problem was compounded by a fall of some
70% in real terms of copper, the country’s main export commodity.
POPULATION AND PEOPLE
The population stands at
around 8½ million.
In 1963 the population stood at 3.5 million but increased to 4.4 million
in 1969 and 5.7 million in 1980.
Estimates based on the 1980 census results show that the population had
further increased to 6.7 million in 1984 and 7.5 million in 1988. (Zambia’s National Population Policy, 1990,
p3).
The
following are the statistics obtained from the World Bank (1990) report:-
- In 1990 the population stood at 7.84
- The rate of growth increased from 3.6%
per annum in 1980 – 1985 to 3.7% per
annum in the 1985 – 1990 period
- The Gross National Product (GNP) per
capital is US$390. (World Bank Report,
1990, p43).
There
are 73 dialects spoken in Zambia, but the main languages are Bemba, Nyanja,
Tonga, Lozi, Kaonde, Luvale and Lunda.
English is the official language.
Language allocation on radio established during the colonial era has
hardly changed. The seven languages
recognized for the purposes of broadcasting in addition to English have been in
use in
primary
school education, and at political rallies.
Mytton (1983) observes that the 1969 census suggested that only 15% of
the population spoke a mother tongue which was not closely related to one of
the seven African broadcast languages.
Thus radio spoke to a larger proportion of the population, both urban
and rural, either in a language spoken home or at least in one closely related
to it. (Mytton, G, 1983).
Bemba
and Nyanja, make up 34% and 17% of the population respectively. Each of these languages has become a lingua
franca in significant parts of the urban areas of Zambia. One or the other is spoken by many more
individuals than one learns either language at home as a child.
In
his 1970-1973 national survey, Mytton (1983) noted that:
‘56%
claimed knowledge of Bemba and 42% of Nyanja.
Of the time devoted to Zambian languages, the Zambia Broadcasting
Services (ZBS) allocated 23% to Bemba and 21% to Nyanja. The small language groups were allocated
proportions ranging from 16% for Tonga to 8% for Kaonde’. (Mytton, 1983, p77).
This
allocation of broadcast time has been a delicate and controversial issue. Certain chiefs and other prominent members of
small language
groups
felt that they are disadvantaged: ZBS’s recognition of a language and its use
on the radio gave that language and tribe a status superior to certain other
languages and tribes.
‘Members
of those groups which were left out of broadcasting felt aggrieved and often
campaigned vigorously for recognition.
Those belong to language groups such as Kaonde, Luvale, Lunda and Lozi,
which were recognized but received proportionately less time, also protested,
saying that all the recognized languages should in fairness receive equal
time’. (Mytton, 1983, p77).
CROWN COLONY POLITICS
It
will be remembered that Northern Rhodesia had a constitution characteristic of
crown colonies. The British Parliament
legislated for the country; many policy changes were effected through
Orders-in-council. Routine matters were
dealt with locally. The Governor
representing the crown and responsible to the colonial Secretary, had executive
powers. He was assisted by an Executive
Council, originally composed exclusively
of
the Chief Secretary, Attorney General, Financial Secretary and Secretary for
Native Affairs.
At
first, the Legislative Council had nine official and five unofficial members;
the latter were drawn from the white settlers who had the franchise denied to
the African population. Africans were
governed from 1930 through a system of local government called ‘indirect rule’
by which the Provincial Administration ruled through local chiefs. This system placed the African population
outside the mainstream of Northern Rhodesia’s politics which were conducted in
the Legislative Council.
The
ambition of the settlers was to get an unofficial majority on the Legislative
Council where they constituted themselves as an unofficial opposition to the
policies of the Colonial Office. By the
outbreak of the Second World War, the settlers had made steady gains and
managed to get representation on both the Executive and Finance Committees and
had increased the number of unofficials in the Legislative Council although
they did not gain a majority.
In
the second half of the 1930s, two talented politicians emerged who showed the
settlers the way and gave them determined leadership.
In
1953, Sir Stewart Gore-Browne, a retired army colonel was elected to the
legislative Council. In 1938, when
Gore-Browne became the nominated member to represent the interests of the
Africans, his seat at Broken Hill was taken over by Roy Welensky, a locomotive
engine driver and railway union official who had grown up in Southern Rhodesia.
The
settlers started to agitate very strongly for closer union with Southern
Rhodesia fearing that Northern Rhodesia might eventually be given majority
rule.
The
end of the 1920s saw the Colonial Office placing increasing emphasis on
trusteeship and African interests. These
sentiments were precisely what the settlers did not want and they were greeted
with suspicion in colonies like Kenya and Northern Rhodesia where the white
settlers hoped to win the political kingdom.
A
shattering blow to settler political expectation was dealt in 1929 with the
publication of the MEMORANDUM ON NATIVE POLICY IN EAST AFRICA, drawn up
by the Colonial Secretary which restated the paramountcy of African interests
in multi-racial territories. The
memorandum reiterated the Devonshire Declaration of 1923 made with reference to
Kenya that:
‘the
interests of the African native must be paramount, and that if, and when, those
interests and the interests of the immigrant races should conflict, the former
should prevail.’ (Command Paper,
1922-23)
The doctrine of
paramountcy caused uproar amongst the Europeans in Africa. In order to calm the settlers, the Colonial
Office backed down and the doctrine became a dead letter. Even after the retraction, the ghost of a
potential paramountcy continued to haunt the settlers of Northern Rhodesia.
The memorandum was a
turning point in settler politics in Northern Rhodesia. Amalgamation had been under discussion for
many years but opinion had been divided and even those in favour did not feel
there was any urgency. Prior to the
memorandum and the economic future that copper seemed to promise, most settlers
either hoped for self-government for Northern Rhodesia alone or amalgamation
with the south when the north was more prosperous and better terms could be
obtained. But as a result of the
memorandum and the economic slump of 1931 – 34, the majority of the settlers
began to feel strongly for amalgamation and started a concerted campaign to
agitate for closer union with Southern Rhodesia.
It is against this
background of white settler political activities and ambitions that I shall
start to look at the development of radio broadcasting in Northern
Rhodesia. I shall begin by discussing
the development of the British Government’s policy on Colonial Broadcasting
before the Second World War paying particular attention to the BBC’s Empire
Service and the local colonial broadcasting.
THE INFLUENCE OF THE BBC
EMPIRE SERVICE ON THE
DEVELOPMENT OF LOCAL
COLONIAL BROADCASTING
The British government’s
policy on colonial broadcasting before the Second World War has two areas – the
BBC’s Empire Service and the local colonial broadcasting. The objectives of the colonial broadcasting
as they emerged in the second half of the 1920s when the Colonial Office began
to explore the implications of broadcasting for the colonies and for the
colonial power were: the projection of Britain in the international competition
for the ears of the world; the strengthening of the imperial link especially
with the kith and kin overseas, and the use of broadcasting in the colonies as
an instrument of administration, education and entertainment.
The BBC Director-General,
John Reith was interested in colonial broadcasting and pushed for it. He was interested in seeing the establishment
of both the Empire Service for the BBC and autonomous local broadcasting
stations. (Briggs, A, 1965, p370).
By 1929, the BBC had
become rather alarmed at the growing number of foreign shortwave broadcasting
stations sending their messages across national boundaries and devoted to ‘world-wide
presentation of the national viewpoint in terms of national culture. (Briggs, A, 1965, p374-375).
The BBC felt ‘the boundary
between cultural and tendentious propaganda is, in practice, very indefinite’
and alluded to the fact that counter propaganda might become necessary. The BBC made its concern known over the power
of American broadcasting interests. The
commercial and political interests in Britain seemed biased in favour of a
shortwave service.
The climate seemed very
favourable because the Colonial Office also called for an Empire Service. There was a feeling at the Colonial Office:
‘that
broadcasting was a service of great imperial value…from the point of view of
sentiment, general imperial patriotism, finance, commerce.’ (Colonial Office 323/1338/5302/1, Memo on
Empire Broadcasting, Bowyer, E 22nd May 1935).
Interest was expressed at the
Colonial Office Conferences of 1927 and 1930.
The BBC had prepared two schemes but they were rejected by the British
government for financial reasons. In
1931, however, with Britain experiencing a financial depression, the BBC
realized that the only way to get anything done was to meet the cost of the
Empire Service by itself. Money was
allotted for this purpose out of the home listeners’ licence fees and on
December 19, 1932, the first regular broadcasts of the Empire Service went on
the air. Briggs (1965) observes that:
‘the decision
was an important one, and it is a comment on the cautious and unimaginative
political attitudes of the inter-war years that the BBC had been forced to take
it unilaterally and on its own responsibility.’ (Briggs, A, 1965, p380-381)
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of
State for colonies at that time, W.G.A. Ormsby-Gore (1924-29) and later
Secretary of State for the colonies (1936-38), was enthusiastic about the
decision. Empire broadcasting was a
matter ‘of the utmost political as well as commercial importance to this
country and was long overdue.’ (Ormsby-Gore to Snowden, Quoted in Briggs, 1965,
Vol 2, p380).
The launching of the Empire Service
activated colonial broadcasting activities.
One Secretary of State after another spoke of the importance they
attached to wireless reception in the colonies of the Empire Service. Another development was that recognition was
soon given to the importance of local colonial broadcasting.
Sir Phillip Cunliffe-Lister who was
Secretary of State for colonies (1931035) addressed governors on the subject of
reception in the colonies in a number of circular dispatches, the most
comprehensive being that of May 8, 1935.
In this dispatch, Cunliffe-Lister discussed not only the purpose of
colonial broadcasting but the question of reception facilities. His desire was to have programmes of British
origin being heard loud and clear in the colonies.
In 1935, this issue had assumed
greater importance than when the Empire Service started because of
proliferation of hostile propaganda being aired on shortwave by Hitler in
Germany and Mussolini in Italy. It was
clear in Cunliffe-Listers’ view that the ‘boundary between cultural and
tendentious propaganda’ had definitely been overstepped.
Cunliffe-Listers’ idea of projecting
Britain was through the broadcast of royal and ceremonial occasions which gave
people:
‘a more vivid
realization of their connection with the empire.’ (Cunliffe-Lister, May, 1935, Colonial Office
323/1338/5302/1)
This was proved with the tremendous
success of the first Royal Christmas broadcast when King George V spoke to both
his home and overseas subjects in 1932.
The Empire service was meant for white populations under British rule
and the few indigenous people who had the educational background to appreciate
the broadcasts which were ‘representative of British tradition and
sentiment.’ (Memo on Broadcasting and
the Colonial Empire, 1935, Colonial Office 323/1338/5302/23)
Broadcasting in Africa was
first meant for the benefit of Europeans living in the more technologically
advanced areas. Mytton (1983) observes
‘Before
the Second World War, broadcasting was aimed almost exclusively at Europeans,
from stations in Johannesburg, Salisbury, Lourenco Marques, Nairobi and
Dakar.’ (Mytton, 1983, p52)
Johannesburg went on the
air in 1924, Kenya in 1928 and Salisbury (Southern Rhodesia) in 1932. In Kenya, broadcasting was organized by
arrangement with a commercial company.
At first it was the British East African Broadcasting Company but this
was later taken over by Cable and Wireless Limited. In other African countries there was an
audience for the Empire Service amongst those who could afford expensive
shortwave sets to listen directly to Daventry.
In his May 8 dispatch,
Cunliffe-Lister enclosed a BBC memorandum dealing with
‘recent
developments in the Empire Broadcasting Service and the methods of reception
which may be employed for the Daventry Service.’ (Cunliffe-Lister, May 8, 1935, Colonial
Office 323/1338/5302/1)
The first was directly
through shortwave receivers; the second through sets turned into local
transmitting stations as in Kenya. The
third method was rediffusion: Daventry would be received at a central station
and from there relayed over a line network.
The Secretary of State
particularly recommended rediffusion for these territories which would not see
their way to establishing a broadcasting station. Cunliffe-Lister also raised the issue of
educational broadcasting which was becoming increasingly important in
Britain. He urged colonies which had local
broadcasting to pay careful attention to its use for educational and administrative
purposes. The Secretary of State made it
clear he was anxious to get progress reports.
Shortly after
Cunliffe-Lister sent his dispatch to the governors in the colonies, the
Colonial Office had a succession of Colonial Secretaries of State; June 7,
1935, Malcom McDonald, November 27, J.H. Thomas and May 29, 1936, W.G.A.
Ormsby-Gore.
Each of them followed up
the interest in colonial broadcasting.
During the short time that Malcom McDonald was Secretary of State for
the Colonies, he convened a meeting at the Colonial Office attended by Sir John
Maffey, R. Vernon, E. Bowyer (the colonial office’s liaison person with the
BBC) and Sir Arnold Hogdeson. At this
meeting, McDonald announced that the Empire stood for ideas and principles of
Government which were being subjected to attack from many sides. He named Germany, Italy, Russia and Japan and
urged that:
‘the
fullest use ought to be made of this most powerful instrument, broadcasting, to
uphold, in the colonies, British principles, ideas and culture, so that the
peoples of the colonies should appreciate more the privilege they enjoyed in
membership of the Empire. In the final
resort it would be such appreciation by the people of the Empire and not armed
force that would hold the Empire together.‘
(McDonald, September 4, 1935, Colonial Office 323/1338/5301/23)
McDonald then suggested
that a committee be set up to make a thorough
and comprehensive
investigation of colonial broadcasting.
McDonald did not stay long enough as Secretary of State to see his
suggestion carried out. It was his
successor, J.H. Thomas who acted on his suggestion and his first step was to
instruct the BBC to prepare a preliminary memorandum which was circulated to
colonial governors. The BBC memorandum
went straight to the point:
‘The
time has come for consideration to be given to definite comprehensive action
throughout the colonial empire to the end that the Daventry Service should
cover the Empire satisfactorily in both the technical and programme sense.‘ (DDC Introductory Memo, 1936, Colonial Office
323/1338/5301/23)
In February 1936, J.H.
Thomas appointed a committee under the chairmanship of the Earl of Plymouth to
undertake a study of colonial broadcasting.
On the committee were
representatives from the Colonial Office who included Vernon and Bowyer with J.
Megson as Secretary; and from the General Post Office (GPO), Crown Agents and
the Advisory Committee on Education in the colonies. Their terms of reference were:
‘to
consider and recommend what steps could usefully be taken to accelerate the
provision of broadcasting services in the Colonial Empire, to co-ordinate such
activities with the work of the British Broadcasting Corporation and to make
them a more effective instrument for promoting local and imperial
interests.’ (Plymouth Report, 1937,
Colonial No. 139)
The purpose of the
Plymouth Report, published in 1937, was to encourage the reception of Daventry
in the colonies especially of events that were of Imperial significance and to
promote the development of local broadcasting services. Singled out for mention was the unique value
of the empire service in providing:
‘regular
daily contact with the home country (and at times with other parts of the Empire)
and the repeated projection on the minds of listeners overseas of British
culture and ideas… and the world-wide transmission of broadcasts by His Majesty
King George V at Christmas and of the Jubilee celebrations’ as outstanding
examples of the value of linking the Empire by broadcasting. (Plymouth Report, 1937, Colonial No. 139, p2)
The new Secretary of
State, Ormsby-Gore, in commending the Plymouth report to colonial governors,
drew particular attention to paragraph 14 which set out the aims and objectives
of colonial broadcasting. He said he saw
broadcasting:
‘…not
only as an instrument of entertainment for Europeans and others of similar
education and means, who can for the most part listen indirect to Daventry and
other stations on shortwave receiving sets, but also as an instrument of
advanced administration, an instrument not only and perhaps not even primarily
for the entertainment but rather for the enlightment and education of the more
backward sections of the population and for the instruction in public health,
agriculture, etc.’ (Plymouth Report,
1937, Colonial No. 139)
This principle is often
still quoted. It is in keeping with the
tradition of broadcasting as a public service established by John Reith, the
first Director-General of the BBC. The
principle was the basis of the report and the report itself came to be the
authoritative text on colonial broadcasting for many years.
The Plymouth Report (1937)
expressed the hope that colonial governments would at least spend a little money
on investigating the possibilities of local broadcasting for Africans. What the authors of the report wanted was an
experiment in the effectiveness of educational broadcasting in adult education
similar to the Bantu Education Cinema Experiment (BECE), in progress in Kenya
and the experiment in broadcasting to schools that was going on in Ceylon. They both saw film and radio broadcasting as
a way of overcoming the problem of illiteracy.
Adult education was a
popular topic in the 1930s and Hilda Matheson (1935) viewed broadcasting as an
important means of contact with illiterate and semi-literate people:
‘To
teach a whole population to read and write is the work of generations; but
broadcasting can jump the stage of illiteracy and carry the new knowledge by a
means which seems the most natural of all means to tribal society. The very drums of Africa are themselves a
form of broadcasting. It is indeed
possible that the art of listening, which is sometimes so difficult to
Europeans trained by books, will come with no effort at all to the village and
family units of Africa.’ (Matheson, H,
1935, 0387)
The fist fledgeling steps
towards local broadcasting to Africans were in West Africa. In the gold coast, broadcasting was first
confined to rediffusion of the Empire Service and local programming was
introduced later.
In 1937, the Northern
Rhodesia governor informed the Secretary of State Ormsby-Gore that the time ‘is
not yet ripe in this territory for the establishment of a local broadcasting service.’ He went on to say however, that consideration
was being given to equipping all government stations with receiving sets and
when this happened he intended to ‘inaugurate experiments in the local
broadcasting of messages, utilizing one of the transmitters at the Broken hill
wireless station. (Young to Ormsby-Gore,
August 10, 1937, Colonial Office 323/1494/5301/40).
As a way of facilitating
development for the Africans, the Northern Rhodesia Central Treasury Fund set
aside £30,000 for the purpose. A Native development Board under the
chairmanship of the Chief Secretary was constituted. Since one of the functions of the Board was
to assist Africans develop the newly constituted Board, in 1938 it asked the
Post Master General to produce a plan to be financed with a grant of £500 from the Fund.
The Post Master General’s
proposal for a number of small, provincial broadcasting stations using low
power transmitters was accepted by the Board.
The experiment was to be conducted by the Provincial Administration at
Broken Hill (Kabwe).
The plan by the Post
Master General included the idea that radio receiving sets listened to by the
Africans should only be able to tune in to one or two stations only. The argument put forward at that time was
that:
‘this
would not only save batteries, but that it would stop the Africans from
listening to other radio stations that were broadcasting anti-British
propaganda and this was clearly not in the interest of the Empire.’ (Fraenkel, P, 1959, p18)
Recommendations for some
programme content were also included: gramophone records, lessons in English,
BBC relays (especially of Royal occasions), concerts and tribal dances,
readings and dialogue in different
vernaculars, local news
and sports, recordings of public functions and even church services arranged by
some larger missions.
From the suggestions of
the content put forward to the Board, it was quite clear that the broadcasting
experiment was in keeping with the spirit of the Plymouth Report (1937), which
stipulated that broadcasting in the colonies should be concerned with the
‘enlightenment and education of the more backward sections of the
population.’ The relaying of the BBC
programmes, especially the royal occasions fits well with the original idea of
the Empire Broadcasting – that it should reinforce the sentimental and
patriotic ties of the Empire. But this
plan was never implemented because Governor Myabin who took over form Young as
Northern Rhodesia’s governor was not keen and was skeptical about the success
of the Northern Rhodesia experiment.
A major event took place
on the Copperbelt which had a powerful influence on the development of the mass
media in Northern Rhodesia in general.
A strike by the African
mine workers in 1935 which caused the Northern Rhodesia administration to begin
the publication of a newspaper for Africans.
The copper industry was just starting to recover from the slump of the
early 1930s when an inadequately publicized change in the tax law provoked a
strike amongst workers at Mufulira, Nkana and Luanshya. Troops opened fire at the Roan Antelope Mine
and six Africans were killed. This was
the first outbreak of urban violence in the country’s history and had
far-reaching consequences. The
Europeans, shocked and frightened, adopted ‘laarger politics’ and banded
together in the Legislative Council to protect European interests.
What was highly
significant for the future of mass communication in the country was the finding
of the Commission of Enquiry into the Copperbelt Disturbances (1935) that the
Watchtower Movement was ‘an important predisposing cause.’ The teaching of this ‘dangerously subversive
movement’ had brought ‘civil and spiritual authority, especially native authority
into contempt.’
The spread of the
Watchtower, they thought, was proof of the influence of literature. The commission concluded that the spread of
the movement had been greatly helped by the fact there was no other literature
available ‘convenient and in cheap form’ for Africans to read. It was therefore recommended that ‘cheap and
suitable literature’ should be provided to counteract the pernicious influence
of the Watchtower publications (Report of the Commission Appointed to Enquire
into the Disturbances in the Copperbelt, Northern Rhodesia, 1935).
Thus the first government
newspaper to be published in Northern Rhodesia was MUTENDE. The first issue appeared in January 1936, and
was a response to the miner’s strike and was to be some kind of insurance
against another rising on the Copperbelt.
It was to keep people informed of what government was doing and so
prevent wild rumours and false reports which might precipitate a disturbance.
Kasoma (1986) has observed
that in retrospect, one is bound to make the conclusion that MUTENDE was
not meant to inform, entertain and educate, in that order, but that the
government made education the most important of the three roles and news was
considered the least important. (Kasoma,
F, 1986, p47)
Perhaps this is better
exemplified in an article by the papers’ former editor, J.G. Phillips in its
last issue when he wrote:
‘It
is generally realized that MUTENDE was started for one reason only. It was intended to supply reading material
for ordinary people. Government had
noted that while thousands of people were obtaining little knowledge of how to
read, there was very little for them to read when they had completed their
studies. (Quoted in Kasoma, 1986,
p47-49)
Many copies of the paper
were also distributed to the African troops fighting along Britain in the
Second World War to read. it was the
only cheap and available literature that the administration (Information
Office) could find ‘suitable’ at that time.
Interest in broadcasting
was also expressed on the Copperbelt in 1938.
The reason seems to have been very much related to the miner’s strike
three years previously. The Provincial
Commissioner on the Copperbelt was making enquiries about wireless equipment
which could be used in the event of an industrial disturbance to relay messages
and to calm large numbers of Africans.
This enquiry was probably
stimulated by Ormsby-Gore whose dispatch of 1938 spoke of:
‘The
potential advantages of installation of loud-speaker apparatus in mining camps
and other similar compact communities in the colonial dependences so that in
case of a local emergency the administrative officer or other responsible
officers who might be available would be in a position to address the community
in question in its own language.’
(Ormsby-Gore, March 21, 1938, Colonial Office 323/1588/5323)
The Copperbelt Provincial
Commissioner who was making the enquiries and had seemed interested in
broadcasting had not gone far with his investigations when the war broke out.
The outbreak of the Second
World War was a blessing in disguise for the development of broadcasting in
Northern Rhodesia. The government
official urged some European amateur radio enthusiasts to broadcast war news to
Africans on the Copperbelt to prevent the mining population from being
disturbed by rumours. Out of this
experiment was born the Northern Rhodesia government broadcasting station.
It will be remembered that
the Plymouth Report (1937) had looked forward to a rapid development of local
broadcasting in Africa and other colonial territories. It did not happen. By the time World War Two started, for the
most part all that had happened, was the accumulation of principles, most
important of which was that colonial broadcasting should be developed as a
public service fundamentally for the administration and ‘enlightenment’ of
colonial peoples.
In 1948, Secretary of
State for the colonies, Arthur Creech Jones (1946-1950) despatched to all
Colonial Governors his confidential circular of May 14, 1948 – Broadcasting in
the Colonies. In this circular Creech
reminded Governors that little progress had been made in the last twelve years,
and the need to introduce broadcasting services was now even greater through
the quickening pace of social, economic and political development although the
urgency would vary from colony to colony.
In the territories themselves, the response was variable; many officials
were indifferent, some outspoken against the waste of money on an extremely
expensive, relatively new invention, but a significant few of the post-war
administrators were enthusiastic and fortunately these included some Governors,
Chief Secretaries and Senior officials who had the power and drive to respond
effectively.
In the next chapter, I
shall look at the role played by some of these officials in the development of
broadcasting in Northern Rhodesia, paying particular attention to the
introduction of the ‘Saucepan Special’ which was also known as the ‘poor man’s’
radio.
CHAPTER THREE
THE
NORTHERN RHODESIA INFORMATION DEPARTMENT
Shortly before the
outbreak of the Second World War in 1939, Britain established a Ministry of
Information for the purpose of directing the nations’ war propaganda
effort. The Empire Publicity Division of
the new Ministry directed colonial war propaganda. By 1940, the Colonial office set up its own
Public Relations Branch. Hence from
1940, Britain had two propaganda agencies whose concern was assembling a
propaganda machine for the colonies. The
finance, facilities and means of production for the Colonial Office publicity
were provided by the Ministry of Information.
The Colonial Office had complete control in that the Secretary of State
for the colonies was responsible for overall policy and the Public Relations
Branch had to scrutinize all the material for the ministry before it was sent
out.
When the war seemed
certain to break out, the Northern Rhodesia Governor, Herbert Young, received a
message from the Secretary of State for the Colonies, which had been sent to
all other Colonial Governors, that in the event of a war a Ministry of
Information in the colony would be established, and to facilitate planning, the
governor was asked to supply details to the Colonial Office about the mass
media in Northern Rhodesia.
When war finally broke
out, an Information Officer was appointed immediately. Sir Stewart Gore-Browne who was the
unofficial member nominated to represent African interests in the legislative
council, was the first choice of the Northern Rhodesia Executive Council. However, when it was discovered that Sir
Stewart would have to resign from the Legislative Council to take up the post
Kenneth Bradley, a colonial civil servant with some journalistic background,
was appointed instead.
In the first few months of
the war, the new Information Office was more or less a distribution centre for
propaganda material sent from the Ministry of Information in London. Very little propaganda material originated
locally. Northern Rhodesia Governor
Maybin was hesitant about exposing the Africans to war propaganda saying it
might give the Africans ideas.
When Kenneth Bradley
started the Information Office, ideas about the role of an information officer
were undefined. But he was an ideas man
with a flair for journalism, and at its most general, Bradley understood that
his job was to keep Northern Rhodesia’s plural society correctly informed about
the war and the activities of the government and to counteract rumours and
stimulate the war effort. Throughout his
tenure as Information Officer, Bradley felt that the greatest challenge to his
job was getting the war propaganda across to the African population. Both the message and the medium presented
challenges. It was not only a question
of how to reach the Africans, but of what to tell them.
The first problem then,
was that of means – there were no facilities.
Few Africans outside the Copperbelt had ever seen a film, and fewer
still had ever had the opportunity of listening to the radio. Propaganda in print had the in-built
limitation of literacy.
The second problem that
presented a challenge to Bradley was comprehension. Most Africans at that time did not have the
geographical, historical or technological background to follow in a meaningful
way the events and the causes of a highly mechanized war happening many
thousands or kilometres away. Related to
the basic problem of comprehension was the issue of how much information about
the war should be given out to the Africans and to compound the problem there
were two types of Africans; those that were on the Copperbelt and had little
education and whom the Colonial Officials agreed needed to be informed about
the war, and those that were illiterate and lived in the rural areas.
Kenneth Bradley launched
the Northern Rhodesia Information Department in 1939 and thus became the first
Information Officer. However, early in
1942, Bradley was promoted and posted to the Falkland Islands as Governor. The new Information Officer, Harry Franklin,
was at the time of his appointment Assistant Secretary for Native Affairs at
the Secretariat in Lusaka. In April of
1942, Harry Franklin was to embark on what was to be a distinguished career as
head of the Northern Rhodesia Information Services, a post he held till 1950.
After Franklin’s
appointment, the Northern Rhodesia government made some notable changes in its
propaganda policy. The duties of the
Information Officer were extended to include Public Relations. The innovation of the public relations
function was noted with interest by the Colonial Office and the idea was
recommended to other Colonial Information Offices.
With the added
responsibilities, the Northern Rhodesia Information Office was upgraded and as
part of the upgrading, all heads of departments and Provincial Commissioners
were directed to keep the Information Office fully informed, which included
making available material for background information which could not be made
public for security reasons. The
response to this was divided. Some
officials cooperated willingly while others refused to assist in any way,
regarding the information department as a very brash organization.
Not only were the
objectives of the information office extended in 1942, but the information
officer was not directed to
‘expand
services; to increase efficiency and to apply for whatever funds should be
necessary to obtain staff and equipment for this purpose.’ (Northern Rhodesia Information Department
Annual Report 1946, p3)
What it meant was the he
was required to build up the office into a department. As it was during the war, expansion was
limited due to shortages of staff and equipment. Despite these restrictions Franklin managed,
by 1943, to set up a film section with a cinema van, a photographic section,
acquired a broadcasting officer and an assistant information officer.
The publication I 1944 of MASS
EDUCATION IN AFRICAN SOCIETY was very welcome to Franklin. He was enthusiastic about prominence being
given to mass education in the colony.
The inspiration for the Mass Education report was political and came
from Arthur Creech-Jones a Labour member of parliament, founder of the Fabian
Colonial Bureau and a post war Secretary of State for the Colonies. Creech-Jones’ concern was that the Advisory
Committee on Education had not given enough attention to the question of mass
education in the colonies.
The most notable efforts
in the field had been as a result of missionary initiative. He also noted that the Colonial Office had
also stressed the great potential of the electronic media, film and
broadcasting for adult education in the pre-war years with little practical
result. In sum, the issue of community
centred adult education was not a new idea at the Colonial Office. Statements of principle had been made in
various reports, including the Plymouth Report (1937), but little had actually
been done.
When the Advisory
Committee on Education in the Colonies met in 1940, it accepted Creech-Jones’
proposal. Although mass education did
not come in for specific mention it was interpreted as meaning education for
the betterment of the community to improve the quality of life of the
people. It was to involve a literacy
campaign and follow-up literature, rural development, agricultural extension
schemes, health and hygiene programmes.
The important aspect was that the community was to be actively involved
and, if possible, the ones to initiate the improvement scheme.
The idea was not to just
have the Africans living healthy and active lives, but there was also a
political objective – education for citizenship; that unless people had a
general education, ‘true democracy cannot function, and the rising hope of
self-government will inevitable suffer frustration (Mass Education in African
Society, Colonial No. 186, p4)
The idea of mass education
was to find one of its most ardent disciples in Harry Franklin. Franklin devoted a major part of his work to
looking after the interests of Northern Rhodesia’s African troops which he
considered an extremely important aspect of public relations. One way of helping the troops was to keep up a
constant supply of reading material, free letter schemes by broadcast to keep
the troops in touch with home. While
Franklin vigorously campaigned for a better deal for the African troops, he was
restricted by the Colonial Office in the handling of certain local issues. For example, anything to do with the
political future of the colony or anything to do with charges of racial
discrimination or colour-bar by African miners on the Copperbelt, were off
limits.
THE FIRST RADIO STATION
RADIO EXPERIMENT 1940 – 1948
War propaganda for the
Africans was conveyed by means of radio, film and the press, mainly MUTENDE. At the beginning of the war, the Copperbelt
Provincial Commissioner, concerned about the possibility of Africans being
‘disturbed’ by wild rumours, encouraged some European amateur radio
enthusiasts to broadcast special news
broadcasts and talks provided by the administration to the workers in the
mines. Kasoma (1990) adds that:
‘…
experimental broadcasts were conducted as early as 1939 on the Copperbelt twice
a week by the Copperbelt Amateur Wireless Club.’ (Kasoma, 1990, p43)
Programmes in three local
languages were broadcast twice weekly.
These were in Bemba, Nyanja and Lozi.
African announcers were used and the programmes consisted of a news
broadcast and a talk.
The talks explaining the
war were written by a District Commissioner in Kitwe, his script checked by the
Provincial Commissioner of the province.
The Mining Corporations
were very helpful. They fitted sets and
loud-speakers in the compounds in four mining towns of Luanshya, Nkana,
Chingola and Mufulira. In other parts of
the Copperbelt, beer-halls, recreation centres and mission stations were
equipped with communal sets. European
settlers were encouraged to allow their African employees to listen in on their
household sets.
In so far as the Northern
Rhodesia administration and the newly created Information Office were
concerned, the Copperbelt experimental news services, provided at this stage by
the amateur radio enthusiasts, succeeded in its objective of ‘spreading
accurate news’ among the uninformed and illiterate African people. The Information Office later announced that
it would start its own government broadcasting station.
By 1940, the Northern
Rhodesia administration seems to have been satisfied that these broadcasts by
the amateurs were fulfilling the functions of combatting rumours about the war
and also keeping the Copperbelt workforce quiet. The Europeans in the Legislative Council were
happy with the broadcasts and decided that the Information Office should take
over from the amateurs and run a small government radio station in Lusaka.
On September 18, 1940,
Governor Maybin officially opened the new broadcasting station of the Northern
Rhodesia government. An African drum was
used as the ‘station identification’. In
his speech, the Governor emphasized the immediate political and administrative
use that the station would serve and that radio would bring government and
people closer together.
The idea of using
broadcasting as a means of providing a government with a speedy means of
communication in the time of some national emergency, was first recognized in
Britain during the General Strike of 1926 when the BBC news bulletin first came
into prominence.
After the strike, it was
widely believed that the BBC news had contributed towards dispelling rumours
and had a steadying effect on public opinion and hence preventing the strike
from reaching more serious proportions.
(Briggs, 1965, p383-384)
What was happening in
Northern Rhodesia was that the administration had got to the point of starting
an official government broadcasting station not to enlighten, educate or
entertain, but for what was a political and administrative purpose – to
broadcast news and refute rumours during a national emergency, in this case the
Second World War. Kasoma (1990)
observes:
‘The
Lusaka station carried out transmissions three days in a week for one hour
every day in the first year. Its purpose
was primarily to inform Africans of the territory about the progress of World
War Two.’ (Kasoma, 1990, p43)
Although these broadcasts
could be heard elsewhere, the initial role of broadcasting in the war effort
was to broadcast mostly to urban and particularly Copperbelt towns. The broadcasts were seen not to be relevant
to the rural Africans whom they did not want to start immigrating into urban
centres.
When it was found that
recruits were slow in coming forward for the Northern Rhodesia Regiment, the
administration changed its policy. It
was decided to step up the flow of information in the rural areas. Talks by returned African troops became a
popular radio feature.
For the campaign to flood
the rural areas with more information to succeed, the Information Officer
sought to arrange for more communal sets to be made available. It was war-time, and obtaining radio
equipment at that time proved to be difficult.
However, the prospect of obtaining more radio sets and making them more
available to the Africans caused some white settlers and even District
Commissioners some concern. They wanted
the sets pre-set or put in the hands of the missionaries or government
official. It should be noted that the
idea of controlling Africans in listening to the radio was very prevalent among
Northern Rhodesia government officials.
They feared that the Africans would listen to anti-British
propaganda. Not all broadcasting
material was concerned with the war.
From the very start music was included to attract listeners.
As time went by, emphasis
came to be placed on the local news. The
war-time Information Officers, Bradley and Franklin were both interested in the
future of radio being used for mass education.
Although Franklin was enthusiastic
about the promise that broadcasting had for mass education, the mood at the
Lusaka Secretariat was one of caution. A
new studio had been built and opened in 1945 on what is now Independence Avenue
and the new radio station seemed poised for better days ahead. However, at the end of the war many
government officials were skeptical about the efficacy of the medium. At the end of 1945, the Northern Rhodesia
Executive Council decided that no more money should be spent on the development
of radio until the efficacy of the medium had been proven.
Many reasons could be
advanced as to why the broadcasting services could not prove itself as an
effective mass medium. But two are
fundamental: First, there were few
Africans with access to radios and second, the fledgeling radio station was
beset with many technical problems that interfered with transmission and
reception.
Radios were most listened
to on communal sets, and at the end of the war it was estimated that there were
not more than 200 sets in the whole country.
At most, only a handful of Africans could afford the luxury of owning a
radio set. Community listening was not
the best; beer-halls and community centres were often crowded and certainly
noisy.
It was impossible to
obtain adequate equipment or staff during wartime. The station was plagued with endless
technical problems. Transmitters were
too weak to cover the whole country and in some areas, transmission was always
poor, in others it varied with the seasons.
All these factors help to explain the hesitancy in the administration
about the future of broadcasting. These
factors gave ammunition to those white settlers and even those in the
government who posited that the African did not want broadcasting and would
never understand it. In addition the
white settler politicians and some officials continued to argue that Africans
would listen to subversive foreign propaganda and cause trouble. Even in the face of all this opposition,
Franklin had the faith of a pioneer in the future of African Broadcasting.
CABS AND THE SAUCEPAN SPECIAL
The issue of post-war
broadcasting came up at the annual Information Officers’ Conference held in
Nairobi. Franklin pushed the idea saying
it was good for reasons of efficacy and economy. However the idea could not be taken up
immediately because there was uncertainty as to whether Northern Rhodesia fell
in the East or Central African zone in the plans of the Colonial Ministry of
Information. This issue was resolved in
1944 when the British government set up the Central African Council. One of the functions of the Central African
Council was to co-ordinate Public Relations and it was to the Public Relations
Committee of the Central African Council that Franklin submitted his plan for
regional broadcasting.
His plan was that all
African broadcasting in the three territories of Nyasaland, Northern and
Southern Rhodesia should be centred in Lusaka, the Northern Rhodesia capital
under its Information Department; and all European broadcasting in Salisbury
(Harare) under the Southern Rhodesia Broadcasting Service.
A BBC engineer, W.E.C.
Varley handled the technical aspect of Franklin’s plan for the Central African
Broadcasting Station (CABS). The Public
Relations Committee of the Central African Council met again in 1946 and
Franklin put forward again his plan for regional broadcasting in Central
Africa. Before the meeting, Franklin
circulated a memorandum in which he spoke very highly of the merits of
broadcasting to Africans. He hoped that
before very long cheap dry battery receivers would be available so that
individual Africans would be able to own their own sets. He devoted much of his energy in speaking
about what he saw as the prime function of broadcasting and that it was an aid
in mass education.
To Franklin, mass
education was not only for ‘the enlightenment and education of the more
backward sections of the population’ in the words of the Plymouth Report
(1937), but also as having ultimate political value.
From the onset of his
career as Northern Rhodesia’s Information Officer, Franklin was a keen devotee
of the ideals of mass education.
It will be remembered that
he encouraged the African soldiers to read and write during the Second World
War and distributed copies of the government paper, MUTENDE. He advocated for mass education because he
was very distrustful of the emerging group of educated African leaders, which
was typical of colonial civil servants.
His mass education policy was aimed at counter-acting the influence of
new leaders. He hoped that mass
education would raise the level of information amongst the ordinary people so
that they would not be exploited by the more educated. He saw this process already becoming apparent
in the country and considered mass education ‘absolutely necessary to avoid
this danger.’
Franklin was happy when he
finally succeeded in winning approval from the Central African Council for his
regional broadcasting plan which had also been submitted to the three countries
individually. In 1947, after many
delays, the scheme was approved and funds allocated. The African side of the agreement was
implemented in 1948, but it was not until 1950 that Southern Rhodesia began
broadcasting to the European population in Northern Rhodesia and Nyasaland.
Although the Central
African Council had given the nod to Franklins’ idea of the Central African
Broadcasting Station, there still remained the problem of reaching the Africans
in the rural areas. Franklin realized
that however much improved radio transmission and programme content might be,
it would be of little value unless Africans became individual listeners. For most Africans in the 1940s, this was
completely out of the question; the radios on the marked were far beyond their
means and he was determined to find a solution to this problem.
‘We
are convinced that before a large audience could be reached, the African must
be able to listen in his own home. This
meant finding a cheap dry battery receiver within the means of the African’s
means to buy for use in the rural areas.
(Franklin, 1949, p9)
Franklin and his staff
aided by the BBC engineer, W.E.C. Varley conducted several experiments in the
construction of a very cheap crystal set with earphones, but for various
technical reasons, these did not seem promising. It was felt that for heavily populated areas,
provided with electricity, the solution lay in installing wire broadcasting
with loud-speakers; this form of diffusion was tried in Kawata, a municipal
housing area for Africans in Lusaka.
However, the difficulty of reaching the African population in the rural
areas continued to bother Franklin until he and Varley drew up specifications
for a radio receiver which was suitable for African conditions. He began a three year search in Britain and
the dominions for a company that would be willing to produce a cheap, dry
battery, shortwave radio receiver.
In 1948, his persistence
payed off when the Ever Ready Company agreed to produce a set that was to bring
the sound of radio to thousands of Africans in Northern Rhodesia. It was called the SAUCEPAN SPECIAL taking its name from its 9 inch, round
aluminium casing which made it look like a saucepan. The metal casing of the radio was from a
factory next door that made saucepans.
The ‘poor man’s’ radio as
it is sometimes known, had four valves and could pick up stations in the three
countries as well as Congo and the BBC.
Even before the advent of the transistor, the ‘Saucepan Special’ made it
possible for many poor people to own a radio set. The Northern Rhodesia Colonial Annual Report
for 1949 states that:
‘The
cheap dry sets not popularly known as the ‘Saucepan Special’, arrived in the
territory towards the end of September.
It was the end of October by the time the sets had been checked, trimmed
and distributed over the country for sale at £6. 5s. od complete with battery. Sets were sent to Nyasaland and Southern
Rhodesia, and by the end of the year, it was known that the average rate of
sales had been 425 a month.’ (Northern
Rhodesia Colonial Annual Report, 1949, p63)
It will be recalled that
since the 1930s, the Colonial Office had been ready to encourage colonial
governments to develop local broadcasting services but it had been up to the
colonies themselves to decide whether they would take up the challenge. In Northern Rhodesia, the development of
colonial broadcasting was very much the result of initiative, ingenuity and
personal enthusiasm. In the beginning
there had been District Officers and the local amateur radio enthusiasts and now
their experimental approach was being taken much further by the Information
Department staff under its Director, Harry Franklin.
The golden years of
African broadcasting in Northern Rhodesia came during the years 1948 and
1952. It was during this time that
experiments on both the programme and the technical side were carried further
than in any other African Colony.
(Broadcasting in the African Colonies, BBC Quarterly, 6,4, 1951-1952,
p217)
This period saw both the
devising of mass education and entertainment programmes with strong audience
appeal. This was complimented by a
dramatic increase in the size of the audience as a result of the introduction
of the Saucepan Special in October 1949.
It was as if Franklin’s dream of a radio in every village in Northern
Rhodesia was close to realization. The
Saucepan Special cost £5 and the battery which lasted three
hundred hours cost £1.5s. If this
is contrasted with the £30 or £40 for the ordinary radio
sets available in Northern Rhodesia at a time when only the Europeans could
afford one, we can understand why there was so much excitement among Africans
who, for the first time, were able to own their own radio sets.
Before
the outbreak of the Second World War, a provisional plan for programmes for the
planned Broken Hill experiment had been worked out.
Half-way
through the war, Franklin had tried to coat the pill of war propaganda and news
with the sugar of music and an occasional instructional programme. In 1948, an experienced broadcasting officer
was appointed to take charge of the Central African Broadcasting Station. Franklin wanted a man who could carry on with
the experiment of using radio as a tool for mass education. Michael Kittermaster was well wualified for
the job. He had worked for the South
African Broadcasting Station in Johannesburg conducting programmes in South
African languages, Zulu, Xhosa, Sesotho and Setswana. He had a good knowledge of not only the
language, but the music of the people.
He studied sociology. What
Kittermaster did not have were South African racial attitudes. He could not tolerate racial discrimination
at Broadcasting House in Lusaka. Both
the African and the European staff responded very enthusiastically to him;
Peter Fraenkel who was a programme assistant under Kittermaster recalls that:
‘He
carried around him a team among whom colour-discrimination was completely
unknown. But more he seemed somehow
unaware of the social pressures outside and all the things that were simply not
done in Rhodesia as if haughtily absent minded.’ (Fraenkel, 1959, p23)
When
he took over the running of the CABS, Kittermaster set about organizing the
station in such a manner that radio should not merely be a vehicle for
government handouts. He thought this would
lose the station the confidence of the African people and fought hard to keep
news bulletins independent. He insisted
on the news being brief and simple and encouraged more local news.
In
1951, due to popular demand, the CABS started relaying BBC news which was not
only appreciated by the educated but also by those who could barely understand
English. The Northern Rhodesia Colonial
Report (1951) put it this way:
‘Many
new programmes were introduced during the year including a Sunday morning
broadcast in English for the more educated Africans Listener Research revealed an increasing
demand for the BBC news and talks. This
is interesting since, although the Africans want such items, they do not fully
understand them. The growing class of
educated and politically minded Africans is using the radio increasingly as an
educational medium. The power and value
of the radio is indicated by the fact that about 5,000 Africans listen in to
Lusaka daily throughout Central Africa.
(Northern Rhodesia Colonial Report, 1951, p69)
By 1950, the CABS had a
large audience and this inspired the Northern Rhodesia Information Department
to launch a five-year multi-media campaign for mass education. The campaign concentrated on six areas which
included improved hygiene, education for girls and better agriculture. Kittermaster was particularly keen to bring
enlightenment to women in Northern Rhodesia.
In 1950, he started a women’s programme and the first African woman
announcer went on the air.
Entertainment programmes
were designed to attract audiences for more notable political and development
propaganda, but they also had conscious social purpose providing new forms of
entertainment for a people whose life-style was undergoing rapid social change. The most popular was the request programme
called ‘ZIMENE MWATIFUNSA’ which is still on the air today in all the
seven languages broadcast on Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation (ZNBC).
Music was a mixture of
traditional village music, which tended to be popular in the rural areas, and
town music. Instructional programmes
were usually of the form of plays to make them more palatable.
It was in the form of
dramatization of information. Especially
popular were plays improvised in the vernaculars by African announcers like MALIKOPO
in Tonga and IFYABUKAYA in Bemba.
Pioneering work on the programme side was guided by feedback from the
audience through listener research.
The experimental work at
the CABS soon attracted considerable attention and broadcasters came from as
far away as the Polynesian Islands to study its techniques. Fraenkel notes:
‘True,
the challenge of the CABS was immense and exciting, to bring education to seven
million Africans by methods new, untried and experimental. There was no president we could follow. We were the first to try, and from as far away
as Paris and the Polynesian Islands, broadcasters were coming to Lusaka to
study our techniques.’ (Fraenkel, 1959,
p26)
The Central African
Broadcasting Station was visited by BBC personalities like talks producer
Sylvia Hingley and John Grenfell-Williams, Head of the Colonial Service and
author of the Unesco Survey, RADIO IN FUNDEMENTAL EDUCATION IN UNDEVELOPED
AREAS, (Paris, 1950).
The Federation of Rhodesia
and Nyasaland came in 1953, and debate started to turn the station into a
Federal Government responsibility. This
was affected in 1958 when the Central African Broadcasting Service and the
Federal Broadcasting Service were amalgamated to form the Federal Broadcasting
Corporation of Rhodesia and Nyasaland (FBCRN).
Under this administration, the Central African Broadcasting Services
continued to operate as an ‘African’ Station although its control was
transferred to the headquarters of the Federal Broadcasting Corporation in
Salisbury (now Harare).
After the dissolution of
the Federation in 1963, Northern Rhodesia had again its own broadcasting
service know as Northern Rhodesia Broadcasting Corporation (NRBC). After independence in 1964, the NRBC was
reconstituted Zambia Broadcasting Corporation (ZBC). ZBC became Zambia Broadcasting Services (ZBS)
in 1966. Ten years later, the Zambian
government decided to turn it once more into a corporation so that it could
generate its own funds and stand on its own feet instead of constantly
depending on government subsidies. It
became a corporation in 1988 (Kasoma, 1990, p46-47).
It is against this
background that the next chapter examines the constraints facing the Zambia
National Broadcasting Corporation (ZNBC) in carrying out its operations as a
national broadcasting station.
Particular reference will be made to its politics, finance, audience
research and policy recommendations.
CHAPTER FOUR
ZNBC
STRUCTURE AND POLICY OBJECTIVES
The Zambia National
Broadcasting Corporation (ZNBC), formerly a government department, became a
statutory body on January 1st, 1988. At
its inception back in 1964 as Zambia Broadcasting Services, its role was
defined in traditional public service broadcasting terms as being to educate,
inform and entertain, but it was clearly seen as an arm of the State’s
information dissemination activities. On
becoming a statutory body some element of independence was introduced although
this related more to government fiscal policy rather than genuine concept of
editorial independence. It was
considered that ZNBC should be self financing.
The government, however, also expected ZNBC to undertake a public
service role very much as before and with similar levels of direct government
involvement in editorial policy.
ZNBC is headed by a
Director-General who is responsible to a nine member Board of Governors.
The Director General and
the Board of Governors are appointed by Government after consultation with the
regulatory authority. As owner of ZNBC,
the government ensures that the selection criteria by which the nominated
individuals are judged to encompass:
-
business and commercial acumen
-
knowledge of broadcasting and awareness of its importance in
the overall national debate
-
overall standing in the Zambian community
-
representation across the range of legal political groupings
-
representation across the range of religious groupings
-
representation of women’s issues
-
representation from the regions and main tribal
groupings. (Coopers and Lybrand Report,
1993, p49).
The Director General
administers the Corporation on a day to day basis through a Corporation
Secretary, a Controller of Personnel and Training the Directors of Programmes,
Engineering and Commercial (Advertising) and a Finance Manager. There is also a Regional Controller who has
responsibility for all programme matters at the Regional station in Kitwe where
he is based.
Since he is the most
senior official at the station, he also has by administrative arrangement,
responsibility for the entire regional station.
He is therefore the chief executive at the Regional level.
Against this background,
all Radio and Television in Zambia is government owned and operated as a
semi-commercialized (parastatal) corporation solely owned by ZIMCO (Zambia
Industrial Mining Corporation) which is totally owned by the government. Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation
operates three radio channels; Radio Two (General Service) which broadcasts in
English: Radio One (Home Service) which broadcasts in seven local languages and
Radio Four a 19 hour commercial FM channel.
All services are operated from the Corporation’s headquarters at the
Mass Media Complex in Lusaka.
Radio schedules carry a
complement of programmes which are by Government policy, expected to comprise
60 per cent music and 40 per cent speech.
A government policy laid down by former president Kaunda at the June 30,
1975 United National Independence Party (UNIP) National Council in Lusaka, in a
speech known as “The Watershed Speech,” defined the role of the press and set
conditions of reference for the operation of the media and more specifically
radio and television as follows;
‘Radio
must continue disseminating information, providing entertainment and education
in all its important aspects. Zambia
Television (TVZ) must, apart from disseminating information, express in depth
the various cultural aspects of this nation apart from entertainment. (Kaunda, quoted in Moore, 1992, p48)
POLITICAL INTERFERENCE
It is for these reasons
that the media in Kaunda’s one party state was subjected to complete control by
his government. Media practice was
guided by Kaunda’s philosophy of Humanism which placed man at the centre of all
activity and, theoretically above all institutions. Humanism envisaged an egalitarian society
where dignity of every individual was guaranteed without regard to social,
class, creed and other distinctions.
Since, at least at the level of rethoric, Humanism placed man above
institutions and allowed him freedom of expression, the product of the
electronic media in Zambia would presumably be seen to reflect the value
of man, egalitarianism,
freedom of expression and the freedom to help individuals to develop their full
potential. (Kantumoya, 1992, p7)
UNIP leaders, making the
masses believe they subscribed to Libertarian principles, always claimed that
the media were free from government control.
But the reality showed UNIP’s theory of the press borrowing heavily from
both the Authoritarian and Soviet Communist traditions. Kaunda often referred to the ‘animal’ in man,
an instinct, no doubt, which must be controlled by the state or the party. Thus UNIP became the supreme institution in
the land, above reproach and accountable to no-one. The party assumed a ‘vanguard’ status and
became the ‘guiding light’ of the revolution.
With that in view, the
party moved to place all the nation’s media under government ownership and
control. Media control was centralized
under NAMECO (the state owned National Media Corporation). The Zambia News Agency (ZANA) consolidated
its role and became the sole recipient and distributor of foreign wire-copy;
press accreditation was introduced as a way of licensing (and keeping track) or
practicing journalists; most
government records were
off-limits and information relating to government business was available only
from officially designated ‘spokesmen’; media heads were appointed and
dismissed by the head of state; radio and television remained exclusively in
the hands of the state.
The media under the
control of the ‘party and its government’, became an arm of the state,
assisting the party to maintain legitimacy and social control. Under the one party system, it was assumed
that the population is agreed on most of the issues. Therefore portraying critical views was counter-productive
to the task of economic development.
Those who exposed contrary views were termed saboteurs, dissidents and
disgruntled elements. The media’s role
was to expose these saboteurs.
A former Interim Chairman
of the Labour Party, Neo Simutanyi (1992) notes that:
‘It
was also common tendency to give coverage to important personages, such as the
President, the Secretary-General, the Prime Minister, Members of the Central
Committee, Ministers and Governors. This
was done in a hierarchical order.’
(Simutanyi, 1992, p3)
Editorials were by and
large supportive of government positions and critical of individuals and groups
opposed to government. Moore (1992) also
adds that:
‘It
is popularly believed that often newscasts are censored by the Director-General
himself, firstly in favour of the party and then the government.’ (Moore, 1992, p47)
Broadcasters worked under
extreme pressure. Between June and
September 1990, ZNBC omitted some of the major stories that were carried by the
print media. The classic ones were as
follows:
-
A major rally in Lusaka favouring multi-party democracy in
September, 1990 was attended by 70,000 people and was located next to
ZNBC. The story received minimal
coverage.
-
ZNBC possibly manufactured technical faults to avoid airing a
report on the inaugural meeting of the opposition Movement for Multi-party
Democracy (MMD).
-
The historic inauguration of Frederick Chiluba as President
of Zambia after the MMD won the democratic 1991 general elections against UNIP
was not covered by Television Zambia.
When the MMD swept into
power on October 31, 1991, it took over the institutions that were state
operated by the ousted UNIP on the platform of political ‘transparency’ and a
return to pluralist democracy. Leaders were
to be more than servants of the masses, acting on behalf of and with reference
to them. The public has the right to
know how their representatives are conducting public business, for in a
democracy, public officials are accountable to the public. The media automatically becomes the
‘watch-dog’ on government and also becomes an open forum for expression of
different ideas and viewpoints.
So far it can be said the
new culture of openness is gradually taking hold, as can be seen from the
frankness with which views are expressed on controversial issues discussed on
ZNBC’s Radio and Television’s TOPIC Programme. One such programme was broadcast during the
period April – June 1992 and featured members of the ruling Movement for
Multi-party Democracy (MMD) and two opposition parties, the United National
Independence Party (UNIP) the Caucus for National Unity (CNU) a Human Rights
Lawyer and an Independent observer on the Merits and Demerits of Pluralism .
However, the electronic
media is still in government hands. What
is more, there are increasing charges by the opposition parties that the media
under the MMD government instructions to ignore or suppress opposition voices
and, in response, the media in their reporting are heavily biased in favour of
the MMD at the expense of the opposition.
If this is true, it may well indicate a hangover from the old culture,
the old system of patronage by which media heads were appointed, requiring in
return a type of allegiance to the appointing authority.
The first Director-General
of ZNBC in the MMD government, Dr. Manasseh Phiri was appointed after a public
search process in which there were 17 applicants who were later short-listed to
8 in June , 1993. He took over from Dr.
Steven Moyo who had served under UNIP’s one party state government. In the early ‘70s, Phiri was a news reader,
disc-jockey and at the same time a medical student. Before taking up the position of
Director-General, he was a Medical Superintendent of two main mine hospitals
Nkana and Kitwe on the Copperbelt. The
BBC report (1993) on Zambia notes:
‘He
is a public health specialist and widely recognized to be very able manager as
well as being a very good broadcaster.
His appointment was widely seen as imaginative and innovative.’ (BBC on Zambia, 1993, p16)
Thus, Dr. Phiri was set to
transform broadcasting into a much more interesting medium to listen to and
much more viable business to manage than it had been before. The Head of the Audience and Research
Department at the BBC, Dr. Graham Mytton, from a trip in Zambia in 1993 wrote
the following:
‘Manasseh
Phiri’s office is transformed. I have
known six Directors of broadcasting in Zambia.
They have all had their own qualities but good management was not really
one of them. Their offices rarely showed
evidence of being a centre of organization or power. The place now has a different air about it –
from the Secretary’s business-like approach when I entered to arrangements of
phones, books, files, etc. inside.’
(Mytton, 1993, p18)
When Dr. Phiri got the
Director-Generalship, he wanted to establish a degree of independence and thus
got assurances from both the Board and the Ministry of Information that he
would have the independence from day-to-day interference from government. He got the assurance. But after just over two months in the job, he
found that he had a big fight on his hands – or rather a series of
inter-connected fights. One was
concerned with the control of staff appointments and placements. The other was the carrying and transmission
of religious programmes on both radio and television. Dr. Phiri had decided to shelve some of the
religious programmes in the hope to forming a religious advisory committee
which would advise and be responsible for their scheduling.
On August 26, Dr. Phiri
was sacked and the announcement made by the Minister of Information, Dr. Remmy
Mushota. The Minister had visited ZNBC
the day before and Dr. Phiri had been his host.
The visit had gone well. Mushota
spoke to staff. He said his relationship
with them would be an ‘arms length’ one.
He supported their desire for independence and paid tribute to the
management changes being brought in.
The next day, Dr. Phiri
was summoned to the Ministry’s headquarters by the Permanent Secretary
Josephine Mapoma who told him that the Board of Directors of ZNBC had been
dissolved and that the best thing for him to do would be to resign. Dr. Phiri replied that he would not do
this. They would have to sack him. He then left the Ministry to keep a long standing
engagement to speak at a management seminar at Siavonga (a tourist lake resort)
on ‘coping with stress’.
The official reason for
his sacking, it was said, was that he should not have been appointed because he
was not properly qualified, not having a degree in mass communication. The BBC (1993) report on Zambia observes:
‘The
whole affair is desperately sad. It has
infuriated a number of people. The
United States Information Service (USIS) has cut off aid and assistance to any
Ministry of Information project. The
British Council and the Overseas Development Aid (ODA) may do the same. A lot of good things about to happen are now
very unlikely.’ (BBC report, 1993, p24)
CURRENT FINANCIAL
SITUATION
Zambia National
Broadcasting Corporation came into existence as a statutory body on January 1,
1988, by an Act 16 or 1987. The Act
enacted by the Parliament of Zambia provides for the establishment of the
Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation;
‘to
define the functions and powers of the corporation; to provide generally for
the control and regulation of broadcasting and diffusion services; and to
provide for matters connected with or incidential to the foregoing.’ (ZNBC ACT No. 16, 1987, p75.)
At the time of converting
the then Zambia Broadcasting Services (ZBS) into a statutory body, it was
thought that the Corporation could run as a commercially viable entity. However, it was deprived of the required
capital structuring, which is fundamental to any business enterprise. It took over net assets of 29.585 million
Kwacha based on the government valuation.
(Confidential Report on ZNBC, 1993, p1)
A confidential report
dated March 22, 1993 on the ‘Brief on the Current State of Affairs of the
Corporation’ shows the Corporation’s financial insolvency in its financial
structure. The monthly operational
deficits incurred since April 1991 of approximately 500 million Kwacha have
completely wiped out the small equity base of the Corporation.
The Confidential Report
(1993) argues that there is meager investment in broadcasting related projects
designed to improve the quality of programmes and quality of transmission. The inability of the Corporation to cover the
most vital routine capital expenditure like audio and video tapes, furniture
for newsroom, studio equipment and the Electronic News Gathering (ENG) cameras
is affecting operational efficiency.
The transport situation is
precarious. Most of the vehicles were
purchased during 1988-89 and have exhausted their estimated useful life. Transport severely affects the news coverage,
engineering maintenance tours and commercial activities.
The Confidential Report
(1993) also states that the external auditors of the Corporation have expressed
concern at the ‘going concern principle’ which envisages the continuity of
business without financial assistance from the government.
The Corporation is also in
no position to service borrowing from commercial banks, nor is it financially
prudent to borrow due to the lack of capital structuring. (Confidential Report on Current State of
Affairs of the Corporation, 1993, p1-2)
And the Coopers and
Lybrand report (1993) adds:
‘Up
until the end of the 1990/91 financial year ZNBC had managed to generate
reasonable revenues and make modest profits and had therefore not required
direct Government subvention. But in
1991/92, the Corporation made a loss of K139 million and the forecast loss
1992/93 was K685 million on a turnover of just K500 million. These losses have totally wiped out the
equity base; the working capital position is extremely weak and there are
US$1.5 million outstanding foreign exchange liabilities. It is expected that the auditors will qualify
the accounts for 1992/93 in that ZNBC is no longer a going concern without the
guarantee of Government support.
(Coopers and Lybrand report, 1993, p26.)
It therefore follows that
the present level of performance of ZNBC has been inhibited by a general lack
of resources and an extremely weak economic position. At the time of publishing the Coopers and
Lybrand Report (1993), the monthly costs of ZNBC were running at approximately
K100 million as compared with advertising revenues of approximately K45
million. The government thus recognized
the need for a subvention to bridge this gap and ensure that ZNBC could
continue to operate and has, since March 1993, subvented ZNBC at the rate of
K50 million per month.
The report shows K1.275
billion expenditure as against only K0.591 billion income, including the
government subvention. It is a distorted
balance sheet. Only K30 million is spent
on programmes; K507 million is drained away by foreign exchange losses (because
of the rapid fall in the value of the kwacha), K356 million on staff wages and
K57 million on transport. (Coopers and
Lybrand Report, 1993, p31)
The report also notes that
the TV transmission network, especially outside Lusaka is in an appalling
state. $0.8 million is need for its
rehabilitation.
For example, drastically
reduced power because of technical faults or missing parts means that there is
greatly reduced coverage in many areas.
Only a one kilometre transmission radius is possible in Mumbwa (west of
Lusaka); and Mongu in the Western Province is radiating on only 60 watts
instead of 1 KW.
As if this were not
enough, ZNBC pays $30,000 per annum to CNN for the nightly use in news
bulleting of excerpts from CNN’s satellite service. The Visnews contract has been cancelled. 70 per cent of all output is now imported at
a cost of between $250 and $300 per hour.
The main suppliers have been Paramount, WTN and Transworld TV. All have stopped their supply because of
unpaid bills totaling $450,000 for programmes alone.
Such is the gloomy picture
of the financial structure at ZNBC as at the Financial Year Ending March 1993.
RADIO AUDIENCE AND
RESEARCH
Development of Research
A British Colonial Office
Committee reported in 1943 that ‘there is no detailed and systematic evidence
of the effects of different types of programmes upon the listeners’ (Great
Britain, 1943, p38).
A decade later the situation
in British Africa was much the same.
Fraenkel in his report on effects research conducted for the Central
Broadcasting Station in the early 1950s wrote:
‘On
the whole vast continent of Africa no one was doing any research of this
sort. Various governments and Colonial
Offices were now starting to pour tens of thousands of pounds into new
transmitters and studios, but nobody thought it worthwhile to spend a penny to
find out what was understood.’
(Fraenkel, 1959, p142)
Since then, millions more
have been poured into new broadcasting hardware in Africa; yet the situation
with regard to research budgets remains much the same. Fraenkel’s research problem had nothing to do
with today’s most common concerns – coverage, circulation, audience, demographics
and programme preferences. Sales of the
‘Saucepan Special’ low cost battery radio and licensing records enable the
tabulation of the audience as it grew.
At that stage African radio set owners ‘thought themselves as an elite
group, almost as an exclusive club,’ and they cooperated readily with
researchers. (Fraenkel, 1959, p136)
Fraenkel concentrated on
problems of programme intelligibility and recall: To what extent were useful
messages in local languages actually getting across? How well were they
remembered? When he found that ‘only a very small proportion of listeners had a
proper grasp of what had been broadcast, he turned to the analysis of reasons
for misunderstanding. (Fraenkel, 1959, p41)
One of the early insights
derived from these investigations was the extent to which radio communication
is culture bound. The Central African
Broadcasting Station tried using public service announcements in the form of
those proverbial sayings which are a characteristic of Central African
speech. The statement “The fly, though
small, is dangerous” failed completely to carry its message; instead African
listeners interpreted it to mean, “Though the Europeans are few, yet they are
powerful… we will never be able to drive them out of the country. (Fraenkel, 1959, p153)
A family serial based on
the soap opera format likewise failed, for “no European could write such plays
and make them sound plausible” (Fraenkel, 1959, p154)
Appreciation studies of
the type Fraenkel used have obvious relevance to all forms of educational and
information/guidance programming. Their
equivalents are studies designed to pretest programme materials before
investments are made in large-scale campaigns or the preparation of educational
lessons. These and many other types of
research, derive their special importance from their implications for the role
of broadcasting in development. A UNESCO
sponsored meeting of research experts concluded:
‘The
mass media are an integral part of national development; indeed they have a
leadership role to play in this field.
Therefore the primary concern of the researcher for some time to come
will be to relate communication to nation-building. Subjects to be taken up for continuing study
will include: the promotion of national unity; the role of communication in
developmental campaigns relating to agriculture, health education, family
planning, adult literacy…Studies on the effectiveness of the media in relation
to their full cost will….be crucial in guiding governments in the allocation of
their communication services. Research
is also essential to broaden the motivational base necessary for wider public
participation in nation-building.
(UNESCO, 1970b, p28)
In Zambia little research
work has been done on the history of broadcasting. The first was in 1959 by Fraenkel and
Matongo. Claypole and Daka (1993) note
that:
‘This
survey had a sample size of 200 and was confined in Lusaka. The results of this survey showed that about
90% of the people interviewed indicated that they had occasional access to a
radio set..However, these findings could not be generalized nationwide.’ (Quoted in Global Audiences: Research for
Worldwide Broadcasting, Mytton, 1993, p60)
In the mid 1960s, the only
audience study at the disposal of the Zambia Broadcasting Services had been a
conventional urban commercial survey made in 1965 for the station’s sales
department by a South African market research firm.
In 1970 ZBS and the
University of Zambia begun an ambitious three-year audience-research project to
include a national survey of people I all parts of Zambia, both rural and
urban. This represented an interesting
carry over from the pioneer research work of the Central African Broadcasting
Station (CABS) by Fraenkel.
In fact the University of
Zambia studies actually followed the recommendations of Michael Kittermaster,
the original director of the CABS.
Kittermaster had left Lusaka after the Federation, but returned when
Zambia became independent and was director of broadcasting until 1967 (Mytton,
1972, appl)
Special attention was paid
to the problems of broadcasting in local vernaculars. Although only seven local languages are
officially recognized and used in the primary schools, some 70 languages and
dialects are in actual use. Some key
findings of this research were that about a third of the sample owned radio
sets and over half listened to ZBS. Over
half the sample thought the radio did not produce enough Zambian music; that
the most popular programmes, all in African languages, were a story telling
programme, a question and answer programme dealing with personal problems, and
record request programmes (Report on the National Mass Media Survey, 1972)
In 1986 the United States
Information Agency commissioned RBL Overseas Ltd to carry out a sample survey
into radio listenership in Zambia. The
survey covered seven of the nine provinces.
The Western and North-Western were excluded and the rural areas
elsewhere were only partially surveyed.
The sample was therefore not fully representative of the total
population.
The UNESCO (1989) Interim
Report argues that 50% of the sample had a set at home. Radio set ownership was more common in urban
(68%) than in rural areas (38%).
Moreover, three out of five rural set owners were at times unable to use
their radios for want of batteries.
Regular listening in urban areas (60%) was almost twice than in rural
areas (31%) and that the main source of news were Zambian radio (40%), word of
mouth (26%) and national newspapers (16%).
Those with the highest level of formal education rely more on newspapers
and foreign radio than on Zambian radio.
People with formal education rely more on word of mouth.
The recent survey to date
was done in 1991 by the ZNBC Research Unit.
It was a national survey which attempted to establish the extent and
characteristics of radio and television ownership, the listening and viewing habits of the Zambian
audience with the aim of making effective decisions about programming and
providing the Commercial Department with data to
assist in making
decisions about advertising rates. Another objective was to discover audience
views on various aspects of ZNBC’s broadcasts.
(Mytton, 1993, p61)
Analysis showed that 82% of the 3,000
respondents drawn from all the provinces in Zambia listen to the radio at some
time. Claypole and Daka (1993) note:
‘three-quarters
(74%) of the sample listen to the radio at least once a week, and 63% listen to
the radio everyday. Most people listen
to the radio at home. Radio One and Two
are heard by about two-fifths of the sample.
Radio Four has a smaller audience because of its short-distance FM in
towns only. 43% of urban respondents
listen to Radio Four daily.’ (Quoted in
Global Audiences: Research for Worldwide Broadcasting, Mytton, 1993, p63)
Topics of interest on the
radio to the majority of the respondents indicated that they are interested in
Zambian music, other African music and agricultural programmes. Claypole and Daka (1993) argue that Zambian
music is of interest to all age groups and that African music especially Rhumba
from Zaire and Mbaqanga from South Africa reduces with age and Highlife music
from West Africa and south African Jazz increases with higher education level.
The other major interest,
agriculture, is indicated across all age groups. However, the interest in it increases with
age and reduces with education. Topics
of interest in order of preference are as follows: Zambian Music, Other African
Music, Agriculture, Relationships (men/women), Sport, AIDS, Learning English,
Medicine/Health, Relationships (Generational), Political events in South
Africa, European/American pop music, Science and Technology, Lives of Africans
in Europe.’ (Quoted in Mytton, 1993,
pp65-66)
POLICY RECOMMENDATION
For the ZNBC to exist as a
viable entity and to be respected as Zambia’s national broadcasting
organization, major changes will be required in a number of areas. The specific objectives of ZNBC need to be
defined and made transparent; there needs to be overall supervision to ensure
that the objectives are being met and ZNBC must undergo a process of change in
order to meet those objectives. The
Corporation should be streamlined to provide a more limited operation than it
currently does at present more especially if the government is to reduce its
level of subsidy. The Coopers and
Lybrand Report (1993) proposes that:
-
There be a drastic reduction of workers to an operational
minimum
-
The Kitwe studios be closed and sold to the private sector
with only an OB/ENG and retransmission facility maintained in Kitwe plus an
advertising sales office
-
The costs associated with operating Radio One be transferred
to the Zambia Information Service (Z.I.S) operating budget and that ZIS
contract with ZNBC for the transmission and broadcast of Radio One programming. (Coopers and Lybrand Report, 1993, p35)
And the Strategic Review Workshop Report (1993) observes
that:
-
ZNBC should move away from medium wave broadcasting which is
expensive to run and instead move to FM
-
Move away from discs to digital (less expensive) systems,
which incorporates continuity studios, production centres, etc.
-
Improve quality of local productions
-
Improve quality of products/services
-
Increase radio and TV coverage area
-
Formulate ZNBC Editorial Policy
-
Carry out a training audit/review and formulate a training
policy
-
Train/orient staff in electronic media (in house and
attachments in Zimbabwe or South Africa)
-
Set up succession planning/human resource bank
-
Review efficacy performance appraisal system
-
Rehabilitate transport and equipment
-
Reduce personnel, through natural wastage from 511 to 450 by
December, 1994. Strategic Review
Workshop Report, 1993, 1pp 1–5)
These are some of the
remedial measures that should be put in place in order to improve the financial
health of the ZNBC and to provide better broadcast services to Zambia.
CONCLUSION
In Northern Rhodesia,
there are two factors that influenced the development of mass communication in
general and broadcasting in particular; events on the Copperbelt and the Second
World War.
The 1935 strike by the
African Mine Workers on the Copperbelt and the fact that copper was important
to the allied war effort, meant that the Copperbelt’s social problems would
continue to engage the
administration’s attention
and the media was brought in to assist.
Another factor which played a major role in the development of the media
in Northern Rhodesia was the special enthusiasm and talent shown by Kenneth
Bradley and especially by his successor, Harry Franklin.
The new media provided the
administration with new channels for reaching out to the African
population. The colonial government
officers had no longer to rely entirely on primary face-to-face
communication. They now used the press –
MUTENDE – and the radio to varying degrees, to explain and publicise
government policies and also helped to create public opinion on various issues
to garner public opinion in support of government policies. The new channels of information also gave the
people new forms of entertainment, helped in adult education and worked towards
adapting Africans to western technological society – with an unavoidable
British bias. The projection of England
predominated. The Imperial ties were
being cemented and contributing to the success of the principal aim of British
overseas information work: the maintenance of the British connection.
There is little doubt that
the most effective medium for ‘socialising’ the Africans, after the advent of
the Saucepan Special in the early 1950s, was the radio. The radio audience was treated to a wide
variety of western and African culture with modern and traditional music, plays
sometimes written or improved by Africans, political propaganda talks, news
programmes and adult education programmes.
The white settler
politicians agitated for the federation and finally got it. The main idea was to see to it that their
dominant position should be made permanent and secure. The federation promoted racial segregation and
racial hostilities became heated.
The Federation of Rhodesia
and Nyasaland lasted ten years. On
December 31, 1963 it was dissolved, and on October 24, 1964, Northern Rhodesia
became the independent state of Zambia within the British Commonwealth.
The broadcasting station
was thus reconstituted as the Zambia Broadcasting Corporation and later Zambia
Broadcasting Services in 1966 before becoming a corporation in 1988.
With a history of fifty
years of broadcasting, Zambia is one of the more experienced countries in this
field in Africa. It was one of the
earliest to venture seriously into development broadcasting and to experiment
widely in that area.
A number of specialized
agencies and bilateral donor countries have, over the past two decades,
invested heavily in broadcasting in Zambia, collaborating both with the
national broadcasting organization and with various programme production
agencies in training and other communication development activities.
The largest investor in
broadcasting however, has been the government.
Throughout four decades, it has provided most of the human, financial
and other resources which have been required for the maintenance and operation
of the broadcasting system. A major
investment worth singling out was the $65 million which went into the creation
of the Mass Media Complex, one of the most elaborate broadcasting facilities in
Africa.
It would therefore be
logical that with this fifty year background, broadcasting in Zambia today
would be among the most developed and the most effective in Africa. This is however, not the case.
Sampling of radio and
television programmes – the only products of the entire broadcasting effort –
reveals mainly a diet of talks, formal discussions and unimaginative
presentations except for a few. The
quality of local programmes leaves much to be desired. This is mainly due to poorly maintained and
outdated equipment and the difficulty of obtaining spares. In some cases, as the Cooper and Lybrand
Report (1993) observes:
‘It
is also due to a lack of sufficiently trained staff and in other instances, it
is due to conflicting demands on equipment and resources.' ’Coopers and Lybrand Report, 1993, p27.)
The MMD Government is
committed to a genuinely independent media sector that serves the needs and
interests of Zambians. In this light,
the role and responsibilities of ZNBC need to be redefined. This reappraisal should encompass not only
the service that ZNBC provides and how this is undertaken, but also how the
provision of the proposed service impacts on the public purse. Whilst ZNBC serves the needs of Zambia, it
must also be borne in mind that, in so far as ZNBC cannot be self-financing,
any subventions are ultimately borne by the Zambian taxpayer.
It is apparent going by
the information and data gathered, that ZNBC is currently offering services
that are below par. In the majority of
its critical functions, performance levels require improvement.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
AINSLIE, R (1966) The Press in Africa
Gollancz,
London
BARTON, F (1966) The Press in Africa
Nairobi
BELTRAN, S (1976) Communication and Development – Critical Perspective
Beverly
Hills and London,
Sage
Pub.
BORDENAVE, JED (1977) Communication
and Rural Development
Paris,
UNESCO
BRIGGS, A (1965) The History of Broadcasting
in the
United Kingdom, Vol. 2 London
DAVIS, J. MERLE (1967) Modern Industry and Africa, Second ed, Cass,
London.
FRANKLIN, H (1963) Unholy Wedlock: The Failure of the Central African
Federation,
Allen
and Unwin, London
FRANKLIN, H (1974) The Flag Wagger,
Shepheard-Walwyn,
London
FRAENKEL, P (1973) Wayaleshi, Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London
FREY, F (1973) Communication and Development in
Pool,
Schramm,
Handbook of Communication,
Chicago, Rand McNally
College Publishing Company
HATCHTEN, W.A. (1971) Muffled Drums: The News Media in Africa
(Ames,
Iowa)
HEAD, SW (1974) Broadcasting in Africa:
A Continental
Survey of Radio and TV,
Temple University Press, Philadelphia
HEDEBRO, G (1982) Communication and Social Change in
Developing Nations – A
Critical View, Ames Iowa State
University
KASOMA, FP (1986) The Press in Zambia
The
Development, Role and Control
of National Newspapers in
Zambia, 1906-1983
Multimedia,
Lusaka
KASOMA, FP (1990) Communication Policies in Zambia
Julkaisuja
Publications
University
of Tampere
LENT, J.A. (1979) Topics in Third World Mass Communications, Hong
Kong: Asia Research
Service
MELKOTE, R.S. (1991) Communication for Development
in the Third World, Sage
Publications,
New
Delhi
MOORE, RC (1992) Freedom of the Press in Zambia:
The Political Reality, University
Press of America
MOWLANA, H (1986) Global Information and World Communication,
Longman,
New York
MYTTON, G (1974) Listening, Looking and Learning,
Report
on a National Mass Media
Audience Survey in Zambia
(1970-74), Institute for African
Studies University of Zambia
MYTTON, G (1983) Mass Communication in Africa, Edward Arnold,
London
MYTTON, G (1993) Global Audiences:
Research
for World-Wide Broadcasting,
London
SCHRAMM, W (1964 Mass Media and National Development
Stanford,
California and UNESCO,
Paris. The Stanford
University
Press
WHITLEY, J.H. (1933) Empire Broadcasting and the New Service,
United
Empire
WILLIAMS, J (1951-2) Broadcasting in the African GRENFELL Colonies, BBC Quarterly, 6,4
WILLIAMS, J (1950) Radio in Fundamental Education GRENFELL in Undeveloped Areas,
(Paris,
UNESCO)
WILCOX, D.L. (1975) Mass Media in Black Africa,
New
York
ZEIGLER and (1992) Thunder and Silence
ASANTE The
Mass Media in Africa, Africa World
Press, Trenton, NJ
PRIMARY
SOURCES
1.
BBC Audience Audience Research Department, Queen’s
Way, London.
BBC
Report on Zambia: 1993
Audience
Research on Zambia: COMBROAD (London) II, April – June, 1974
2.
BBC Written Archives Centre, Caversham Park, Reading.
Colonial
Broadcasting, File No. 2:1944-1946
Colonial
Broadcasting, File No. 3:1947
Colonial
Broadcasting, File No. 5: 1949-1950
3.
Zambia National Archives Library Lusaka
Northern
Rhodesia Colonial Annual Reports, 1933-1953
Northern
Rhodesia Information Department Annual Reports 1946-1959
Report
of the Broadcasting Commission of Inquiry, 1955
Federal
Broadcasting Corporation Annual Report, 1959-60
Federal
Broadcasting Corporation Annual Report, 1962-63
DOCUMENTS
Report
on the Development of Broadcasting to Africans in Central Africa, Franklin, H, 1949.
Confidential
Report on Broadcasting to Africans from Lusaka, Franklin, H, January 18, 1949
From
Modernization to Cultural Dependence:
Mass Communication Studies and the Third World, Sinclair, J, No. 23,
February, 1982.
Developments
in African Broadcasting during the 1980s, Mytton, G, October 30, 1988.
From
Saucepan to Dish: The Implications and Possibilities of New Technologies for
Broadcasting in Africa, Mytton, G (Unpublished manuscript.)
UNESCO
Interim Report Vol. 2 on Broadcasting for development in Zambia, UNESCO, 1989.
World
Bank Report: Zambia, 1990.
Zambia’s
National Policy: Office of the President, National Commission for Development
Planning (NCDP), Lusaka, 1990.
Development
Journalism in Africa: Capitulation of the Fourth Estate, Africa Media Review Vol.
5 No. 2, 1991.
BBC
International Broadcasting and Audience Research: The BBC in Zambia
(August-October 1991) Main Findings.
The
Zambia National Broadcasting Corporation ACT, 1987.
ZNBC:
Zambia National Media Survey Report, 1991.
ZNBC
Survival Plan Workshop, Sept, 1992.
Democracy
and the Media in Zambia: Which way forward? : Historical Perspective: Some
Lessons from the Development of the Media in Zambia, Kasoma, F.P., October 2-4, 1992.
Democracy
and the Media in Zambia: Which way
forward? : Freedom and Responsibility of the Media, Kantumoya, L, October 2-4, 1992
Democracy
and the Media in Zambia: Which way forward? : The Role of the Media in a
Democracy,
Simutanyi, N, October 2-4, 1992.
Coopers
and Lybrand Report on Privatization and Commercialization of Government owned Media, 1993.
ZNBC
Confidential Report on Current State of Affairs of the Corporation, March 1993.
ZNBC
Strategic Review Workshop Report, August, 1993.
No comments:
New comments are not allowed.