MATING SEASON

Welcome to Zambia's political "mating season" - that time in our political calendar when bars, schools, homes and the general media are abuzz with talk about the need for unity amongst opposition parties for the primary purpose of saving the country from the tyranny of a government that has stopped caring about the people. This is the time when one politician after another fancies their chances at being able to attract the support of rival politicians to attain the elusive prize of becoming the republican president.

Some commentators have even gone as far as claiming the existence of an alliance among various political parties including NAREP that they now claim we have supposedly withdrawn from. This information is of course false but the truth is going to be hard to decipher when so much seems to be at stake in our current political climate. Before we address this issue of NAREP's position on political alliances, however, let us look at a the short history of these alliances in Zambia.

Interestingly, the most memorable political alliance after Independence occurred in 1990 and did not even involve a single political party. When the Movement for Multiparty Democracy (MMD) was born, there was no such thing as opposition politics and few were prepared to be openly associated with the MMD, including its most famous leader Frederick Chiluba. One of the MMD's pricipal founders, Akashambatwa Mbikusita Lewanika, faced several hurdles in convincing Chiluba and others of an idea whose time had come. That idea was multiparty democracy. Eventually, however, the momentum grew and groups from all walks of life and all sectors of society came together and were successful in unseating an administration that had been in power for 27 years. Sadly, the unity extended only as far as the resolve to remove Kaunda from power and in due course, it became clear that the party that spearheaded a return to plural politics had lost its relevance.

Since then various other political alliances have been attempted, with little or no success. When several parties came together to form the United Democratic Alliance in order to contest the 2006 elections under a single candidate, the battle as to who would be the flag-bearer resulted in acrimony and distrust and left bitter repercussions amongst the participants that persist to this day.

When we fast-forward to 2011, we see how the attempt by the Patriotic Front and the United Party for National Development collapsed spectacularly over the question of who the leader of this united force would be. The leadership question was really just the tip of the iceberg. Deeper problems of the lack of a common party culture, the lack of similar values and vision as well as a lack of commitment to establishing sound working committees to iron out the objectives were evident from the very beginning and persisted throughout the entire period that the two camps publicly pretended that the "Pact" existed.

The lasting legacy of these failed attempts at political union has been a deep suspicion amongst politicans. This suspicion is rooted in the bitterness and animosity that resulted from the failure of previous alliance partners to successfully resolve the question of who the leader would be without injuring one another in the process.

While it is indeed important, preoccupation with the question of leadership of a political alliance is a double-edged sword. Putting off the decision as to who the leader will be can help to move things along initially but it tends to create an environment of unhealthy competitiveness which if not handled correctly could destroy the very unity upon which the alliance depends. Further - and as already alluded to - it is not the only factor that makes for a successful alliance.

Entering a political alliance is not something that should be done lightly or in haste. If it is is to be done sustainably, it is something that should be based on a bigger motive that just removing a bad leader from power. We have repeatedly pointed out that coming together purely for the purpose of unseating a bad administration is a recipe for disaster and will only carry an organisation so far.

NAREP believes that for political alliances to work successfully in our current climate in Zambia, five things are critical and need to be fully ironed out not after but before any talk about an alliance can be concluded: (a) identification of a shared vision and values; (b) agreement on clear objectives; (c) agreement on structures and how the work of the alliance will be coordinated; (d) drafting of a roadmap; and (e) identification of a flag-bearer or leader.

It is for this reason that when we were invited for talks to form an alliance with a group of political players, we made ourselves available to explain our reservations about proceeding in the manner intended. This was the right thing to do and it is what we would expect from any self-respecting political party. It is therefore wholly incorrect to state that we have left any so-called alliance - for how can someone leave something that does not yet exist?

Too many politicians have made the mistake of rushing into marriages of political convenience only to regret the decision when the true nature of the participants emerges over the fight for who will be in charge. We do not want to be a part of such an outcome. The values that guided our journey into politics remain the values that will guide our continued belief that our country needs leadership that can focus on issues and not insults, problem-solving not personality-bashing, development and not disunity, people and not just politics.

Let us not lose sight of the real battle before us - putting in place at all levels of society, the leadership that will restore the fortunes of our nation and enable each and every Zambian to have the unfettered opportunity to pursue all their legitimate dreams and aspirations and live up to their full potential.

May God's grace be with Zambia.

Elias C. Chipimo
President
National Restoration Party

CATHOLIC BISHOPS TELLS PF TO STOP USING STATE SECURITY TO INTIMIDATE CITIZENS

THE Catholic Bishops have asked the Patriotic Front (PF) government to stop using state security to intimidate Zambians.

And the Catholic Bishops have expressed concern that Zambia is eroded by governance arrogance.

In a statement delivered by Zambia Episcopal Conference (ZEC) today (January 23), the Catholic Bishops  urge the PF government to stop using state security institutions to intimidate its own nationals.

“The police service in particular must be professional and impartial in carrying out duties,” read the statement in part.

The Catholic Bishops noted that there was demonstration of lack of humility among some of the political leaders.

“And this has led to lack of stakeholder consultation when making decisions on key policy matters. Why is it that those who try to question certain practices are treated with scorn and humiliation? These are manoeuvres meant to intimidate people from participating in their own affairs and providing checks and balances in the governance of this country,” read the statement.

Find below the full statement delivered by the Catholic Bishops.

PRESS CONFERENCE BY THE
ZAMBIA EPISCOPAL CONFERENCE (ZEC)

Salutation

Dear members of the Press and invited guests, New Year greetings from us, the Zambia Episcopal Conference.

On the occasion of our first plenary session in 2014, we have invited you here to share with you and through you with the nation our perspective of various issues that are affecting our country.

1. Introduction

We thank the Almighty God for preserving our country in relative peace and unity throughout 2013.
We note with joy and gratitude to God that this year, our country is celebrating its golden jubilee of independence. This is a great achievement for our country. In this vein, we give thanks to God for his mercy on our country; we honour our founding fathers and mothers who sacrificed for our freedom and salute every individual Zambian for their personal contribution to the harmony we enjoy in our country, today. Scripture says; “Blessed are the peace makers, for they shall be called Children of God.” Matthew 5: 9

2. Issues for reflection.

As we start the New Year, it is incumbent upon us to share with the nation our reflections on the year 2013 as well as our expectations for 2014.
The state of our country is the responsibility of all of us and therefore each one of us has a duty to contribute to the wellbeing of people and harmony in our country. In a great measure, Zambians have lived up to this task and we urge them to continue.

3. The Duty of Government

We thank God that since Zambia attained independence about 50 years ago in 1964, the country has had relatively stable successive governments elected by the people of Zambia in various political systems. Being elected by the people, this bestows great responsibility on the part of government. At all times, government must endeavour to work to promote the common wellbeing of all the people. We all know that the way government manages public affairs and exercises its stewardship of power invariably affects everyone in the country.

Therefore citizens expect their government, amongst other things, to be humble listeners to the people who are the real masters of governors; to promote integral development and to guarantee peace and political stability; to ensure that human rights are respected and that there are good health facilities and education system, and that majority people have access to such facilities, but above all that all citizens are treated with dignity and respect.

4. Taking Stock in the New Year

As we start the New Year, we need to indeed take stock of our country so that we improve on what we are doing well and avoid the pitfalls that we have experienced in the past. We acknowledge the effort government is making to improve the welfare of the Zambian people and their dignity. We recognise, in particular, improvements to the economy and road infrastructure development in some parts of the country.

5. Challenges

Notwithstanding the gains mentioned above, we note with deep concern that the strides Zambia could have made continue to be negated and eroded by governance arrogance of the know it all type. There is demonstration of lack of humility among some of our leaders and this has led to lack of stakeholder consultation when making decisions on key policy matters. Why is it that those who try to question certain practices are treated with scorn and humiliation? These are manoeuvres meant to intimidate people from participating in their own affairs and providing checks and balances in the governance of this country.

To date there are many unresolved issues and negative developments that are taking our country many years backwards. In our similar statement at the beginning of 2013, some of these governance concerns were raised, for instance:

·         The hostile political environment in our country,

·         The high incidence of by-elections,

·         Lack of political integrity among our politicians and leaders,

·         The selective application of the Public Order Act by the Zambia Police Service,

·         The deteriorating human rights situation in our country,

·         Intimidation and police repressions with regard to the Barotse issue in Western Province,

·         The stalled constitution making process.

It’s is sad that these concerns have continued to be unresolved even as we enter 2014. Today again we reiterate our concern on the same issues and many more and state where we as Zambia Episcopal Conference stand on those issues.

5.1 The need for co-existence, tolerance and respect in politics

The dream of the return to multi-partism in 1991should be enhanced by an acknowledgement that Zambia now has many political parties. It is normal, therefore, for the political atmosphere to be characterised by divergent views and political ideologies. In this respect, freedom of expression and association should not only be tolerated but should be allowed to flourish. We once again deplore the abuse and biased application of the Public Order Act by the Police Service.

The political environment in Zambia, today, is characterised by manipulation, patronage and intimidation of perceived government opponents. We urge the government to stop using state security institutions to intimidate its own nationals. The police service in particular must be professional and impartial in carrying out their duties of maintaining law and order. Too many of the nation’s resources and time are wasted on politicking at the expense of real development. This culture must change for the better.

5.2 Unnecessary by-elections

We further lament the vast sums of money that have gone and continue to go into holding of by-elections. These funds could have given Zambians many schools and hospitals. We appeal to the whole country to seriously reflect on how best unnecessary by-elections can be avoided. We are aware that this is worsened by the stalled constitution making process that could have provided legal limitations to by-elections. That is why we demand putting back on track the constitution making process which will give Zambians a chance to resolve problems inherent in our governance processes like elections.

5.3 The failure to pursue a predictable constitution making process after a spirited start in November 2011

It is imperative that the Government should decidedly set a legacy for itself by bringing this matter to a logical conclusion that is acceptable to all stakeholders.
We believe that the draft of the Technical Committee is a summation of the wishes and aspirations of the Zambian people. What needs to be done now is for the Government to take the necessary steps that will move this process forward as demanded by the people of Zambia.

We cannot go the way of the Inquiries Act, whereby the President and his cabinet sit to cherry-pick what they think should be in the constitution. We have been down this route before where respective ruling parties have desired that the constitution be made in their party’s image and likeness. This has always not worked and it will not work even now.

The people of Zambia are demanding nothing less than a constitution given to themselves by themselves. The final draft Constitution prepared by the Justice Silungwe technical committee should without further delay be released to the public and other stakeholders, consistent with the roadmap announced by the Constitution Technical Committee at the commencement of its mandate. The people have spoken many times over the years and even now; they want the constitution adopted through a referendum, Vox Populi, Vox dei,-the voice of the people is the voice of God. We reject the excuse of expenses given the fact that the country has lost huge amounts of money in the botched processes of the past. Now we have a chance to resolve this long standing constitution issue in a more sustainable way. This chance should not be allowed to yet again pass.

5.4 Food Security Situation

The food security situation of the country is at threat and it has been escalated by the late delivery of farming inputs particularly fertiliser for the 2013/2014 farming season. There has been a nationwide cry on the late delivery of farming inputs. This delay is likely to negatively affect this year’s maize harvest. Unfortunately, this comes at a time of increased mealie meal prices, which have partly been caused by the removal of subsidies on maize and fuel which has in turn resulted in the high cost of living. Many families are seriously struggling to make ends meet. We call on Government to mitigate the suffering of its people. Further, we hope that this year, 2014, the government will avoid delays in distributing farming inputs. The Government should seriously explore remedial measures to mitigate the impact of high mealie meal prices on the poor.

5.5 The failure to engage constructively with traditional leaders in order to resolve disagreements

There are a number of outstanding issues involving traditional leaders that are almost threatening their status in the Zambian society. At the root of this is the behaviour of some politicians trying to interfere with traditional institutions. Traditional affairs and conflicts related to succession should be resolved by set customs, procedures and systems within the traditional structures with recourse to the courts of law when need be. Government should only come in when such systems violate state laws and human rights.

5.6 The role of the media in Zambia

The value of having a thriving professional media cannot be over emphasised. The media play a big role as the fourth estate by educating and informing the public. We deplore the practice of harassing media personnel by some members of the public when these noble men and women are on duty. Government must put in measures to protect media personnel.

As ZEC, we are also concerned about the way government is dragging its feet in enacting the Freedom of Information Bill. This matter has been outstanding for a long time through successive regimes clearly as a result of lack of political will. We want to see this law enacted in this jubilee year.

On the other hand, the media should objectively, accurately and truthfully bring out issues as they are. Unfortunately, we are seeing a media environment in Zambia that is highly polarised and compartmentalised along political preferences. This has deeply undermined the integrity of our media. We call upon both the public and private media to uphold the highest standards of professionalism and ethics.

5.7 Standoff with striking/fired nurses

So much commentary and blame apportioning has been made by stakeholders on the standoff between government and the nurses. For us the only losers are the poor people who have died and continue to die due to lack of attention by our health institutions. People were dying when nurses went on strike and they continue to die now when government has punished the nurses by firing them. This is surely a no win situation for the patients who are suffering in our hospitals, Therefore government must play a leading role in adopting a more reconciliatory approach in the resolution of this situation that continues to endanger the lives of citizens. We want to encourage dialogue and solutions that put the interest of patients first.

6. Governing by decrees

In our past statements in 2013, we consistently appealed to government to promote a culture of consultation as a basis of policy and decision making. Ruling by decrees is not only undemocratic but also denies our country the benefit of bright ideas that could be offered by many citizens not in positions of decision making. Some decrees have led to policies that raise great challenges to implement. In the past we have talked about decrees on creation of a multitude of districts; today it is the issue of using local languages as a mode of instruction at lower primary in our schools and then the issue of SI No. 103.

6.1 Introduction of local languages as a medium of instruction at lower primary in our school:

Already the directive to use local languages as medium of instruction in our lower primary schools is proving to be a major challenge with respect to implementation. Teachers are not enough or trained to cater for the language diversity of our country. It is also unjust and a violation of human rights to force children to learn in local languages that are not their native languages. This arrangement will definitely advantage children who are native speakers of the language of instruction above their peers who are not. We urge government to immediately withdraw this policy and engage in real consultations on it.

6.2 The Statutory Instrument No. 103 of 2013

The revocation of the tax exemption for Public Benefit Organisations and Non- State charitable actors such as the Church through the Statutory Instrument No. 103 of 2013 is seriously ill advised. The implementation of this policy decision in our view is punishing the majority poor who are the beneficiaries of the services offered by the Church and other charity institutions. If the decision on SI 103 is not reversed, it will be impossible to offer social services as the Church is doing now. Therefore as ZEC, it is regrettable that we may be forced to disengage from offering social services such as health, education, vocational training, home based care and hospices due to diminished capacity occasioned by the implementation of SI 103. The implication of this is that the poor who are the main beneficiaries of the services of the Church will suffer as they will be deprived of essential social services provided by donations from overseas through local charities. We urge the Government to seriously reconsider and reinstate the previous procedure which provided appropriate criteria for clearance.

7. The Golden Jubilee of Independence

As we celebrate the golden jubilee of Zambia’s political independence, we appeal to all citizens to reshape Zambia into a country full of great prosperity. We also call for the nation to use the Golden Jubilee to foster dialogue, reconciliation and social justice. Let it be a year of renewal, self cleansing and reconstruction.
We also urge the government to quickly give clear direction and programme of events and activities that will be carried out during 2014 to mark the commemoration of the golden jubilee of Zambia’s independence. In this way, the nation will fully own the celebration and participate fully.

8. Conclusion

As Zambia Episcopal Conference, we give these views on the state of our nation with great humility and deep concern for the people of Zambia. We mean well and we pray for Zambia to be a successful democracy. It is our hope that this year will make a difference in the way we do our politics. We look forward to the resolution of many unresolved issues that we have highlighted in this press conference this morning –issues to do with our republican constitution, matters with traditional rulers, delays in the distribution of farming inputs, by-elections, lack of consultation on policy issues (e.g. education and SI 103) and acrimony in our political landscape to name but a few.

Members of the press, distinguished invited guests, Thank you for your attendance. May God bless our great country.

Issued at Kapingila ZEC House, Lusaka, Zambia on 23rd January, 2013

Most. Rev. Ignatius Chama – Archbishop of Kasama, Apostolic Administrator of Mpika and ZEC President
Rt. Rev. Alick Banda – Bishop of Ndola and ZEC Vice president
Most. Rev. Telesphore-George Mpundu – Archbishop of Lusaka
Rt. Rev. Raymond Mpezele – Bishop of Livingstone
Rt. Rev. Emilio Patriaca – Bishop of Monze
Rt. Rev. George Cosmas Zumaile Lungu – Bishop of Chipata
Rt. Rev. Charles Kasonde – Bishop of Solwezi
Rt. Rev. Evans Chinyama Chinyemba, OMI – Bishop of Mongu
Rt. Rev. Clement Mulenga, SDB – Bishop of Kabwe
Rt. Rev. Benjamin Phiri – Auxiliary Bishop of Chipata
Very Rev. Fr. Michael, M. Afr. – Apostolic Administrator of Mansa
Rt. Rev. Aaron Chisha – Bishop Emeritus of Mansa

'MANAGING EXPECTATIONS' ON POWER AFRICA

Six months after U.S. President Barack Obama launched Power Africa, the interagency team is still defining roles and creating strategies. Will its leaders find a strategy that balances quick wins with long-term results?

Children study using a solar-powered lamp in Iringa Region, Tanzania.

U.S. government leaders involved in the Obama administration initiative to increase energy access sub-Saharan Africa shared their thoughts on what they have learned so far about the ambitious energy access and investment push.

The clearest message to emerge from last week’s panel discussion was that the key is “managing expectations.”

Officials from the U.S. Agency for International Development, the Overseas Private Investment Corp., the Millennium Challenge Corp. and Capitol Hill discussed at the Center for Global Development how their agencies’ unique mandates and perspectives are contributing to a coordinated approach to combat energy poverty on the continent.

The big idea behind Power Africa is that it can draw on the entire U.S. government “toolbox” when it looks at high-potential power deals that have become road-blocked by political, regulatory, or business-related obstacles, and what can be done to move them forward.

But while supporters say the inter-agency “transactional” approach is the initiative’s greatest strength, it also means it is subject to a wide range of expectations, since each agency involved — not too mention the variety of private investors and foreign government institutions — has a different mandate and different set of constituents to please.

In particular, Power Africa could face potential interagency conflicts between those who want a lot of transactions to happen quickly and those who favor a more long-term, systemic approach to power development.

Common strategy

Power Africa’s agency representatives will have to be clear with each other about an inter-agency strategy for balancing individual power deals that keep Power Africa’s public and private partners engaged with deeper structural changes and reforms that take time, patience, and a willingness to wade through the slow, political process of institutional capacity building.

USAID’s Power Africa Coordinator Andy Herscowitz reported mostly positive progress in the first six months, including what the agency calls a “landmark” deal last September between the government of Ethiopia and Reykjavik Geothermal, a US-Icelandic private developer, to construct the Corbetti geothermal plant, the “first independent power project in Ethiopia’s history.”

But Herscowitz also suggested the initiative’s first stage has seen the various agencies continue to grapple with how to better “define their roles” with respect to their fellow public and private partners.

USAID has been criticized for a perceived overdependence on one-off initiatives. At the same time, lack of access to energy is seen as a fundamental roadblock to a wide array of development, education, and economic growth goals, which many of the agencies involved in Power Africa have in common.

It was evident from the panel that finding that balance will be important if the initiative is going to ensure continued buy-in from its stakeholders. For example, OPIC might be more interested in securing large, individual power purchasing agreements quickly, since they were created with the “core mandate” to facilitate U.S. investment abroad, said OPIC Executive Vice President Mimi Alemayehou.

OPIC measures success in part by the amount of investment leveraged across its portfolio in a given year, and the agency has been singled out as one most capable of actually delivering the transactions to reach Power Africa’s energy access targets.

MCC on the other hand says it is most concerned with establishing the longer-term foundation for African governments to structure and complete their own power deals after the initiative ends.

Kamran Khan, MCC’s vice president for compact operations, noted that individual transactions and infrastructure projects are “helpful,” but more because of their positive incentives for regulatory and institutional changes than their individual wattage achievements. Herscowitz likewise lauded the “demonstration effect” individual transaction can have, noting the goals is, “not flipping the switch but opening up the market.”

Coordination a challenge

Ben Leo, a long-time energy poverty advocate who moderated last week’s panel at the Center for Global Development, expressed similar concerns that an overemphasis on individual deals could make it hard to transition from the “transactional” to the “structural.”

USAID meanwhile has a challenging role to play by ensuring that each agency feels its investments in powering Africa are achieving their expected results — especially when those expected results vary between participants.

While sometimes portrayed as a silver bullet, interagency coordination is never easy and can get stalled or sidelined by competing mandates and rivalries — just ask the Global Health Initiative. But the credibility of the U.S. aid enterprise depends on the ability of an administration to name goals and coordinate its resources to achieve them — as Obama promised to do with Power Africa.

If the Electrify Africa Act passes through Congress this year, as some expect it might, the number of spectators, voices, opinions and targets will only increase.

devex