Access remains a challenge for most
humanitarian groups in South Sudan, even after the government and opposition
forces finally agreed to a cessation of hostilities last week in Addis Ababa.
Members of the United
Nations Mission in South Sudan stand guard at a
camp for internally
displaced persons fleeing the violence in the country
|
This is what several aid officials
told Devex four days into the ceasefire agreement, which should have taken
effect on Friday. They said pockets of conflict and sporadic fights remain in
several states, making it difficult for them to access many internally
displaced people cut off from assistance during the conflict and to preposition
items that should already be in place before the coming rainy season.
“Things are improving but in a slow
pace. We can move freely in some parts of the country, but not all,” said
Plan
International Country Director Gyan Adhikari.
Aid groups have welcomed the
agreement, and are looking at taking advantage of the current ceasefire. But
they argue the conflict in the past month has led to an increase in IDPs, their
humanitarian needs and less
humanitarian supplies, some because of looting.
“The biggest challenge is the lack of
access to preposition the largely needed food, goods and essential items. This
will remain one single challenge for all actors including the UN and especially
in responding to the already displaced people in Upper Nile, Unity and Jonglei
states,” Adhikari explained.
Logistical impediments
The challenges
relating to access and procurement in the past month led Plan to
establish a regional logistics hub in northern Uganda to help it to
“proactively procure, move and distribute essential items as humanitarian
access and security permits,” and Adhikari says the organization has had
“strategic discussions” with the United Nations and other aid organizations on
other possible logistics arrangements in the coming weeks.
Oxfam had been airlifting
sanitation supplies from Juba and the United Kingdom to reach people who fled
fighting in and around the town of Bor, but it also hopes to be able to shift
back to some form of land transport, although that has been a challenge in
itself as there are only some 300 kilometers of paved road across the country.
Air transport is expensive and could
use up a huge portion of aid groups’ budgets, which means they would have less
funds to respond to potentially urgent needs once the rainy season starts.
ACTED Country Director
Emilie Poisson, meanwhile, explained that her organization relies mostly on the
U.N.’s humanitarian air service managed by the World Food Program, but
admitted the loss of supplies in December due to lootings and/or commandeering
“has had significant impact on the rate and amount in which humanitarian
partners should be prepared for prepositioning.”
‘Wait and see’
But apart from access and
prepositioning goods, aid groups are also worried over the loss of many
people’s livelihoods.
Oxfam Assistant Country Director Emma
Jane Drew said her staff have encountered many people who had to sell entire
herds of cattle or stockpiled harvest “just to be able to afford journeys to
safety.”
“This is seriously worrying as it
indicates displaced people will have nothing to go back to when they decide to
return home. At the moment Oxfam’s assessing how we can best respond to those
needs now,” Drew said.
These and the issues of impartiality —
which was initially thrown at the United Nations, but has affected some
humanitarian organizations — appear to continue to be huge impediments to the
aid community’s work in South Sudan, even with the ceasefire in place.
Poisson noted: “Everyone is hopeful
that [the ceasefire] would hold, but obviously everyone is also in a position
of ‘wait and see’ for action to be implemented on the ground.”
No comments:
Post a Comment