Bill
Gates has weighed into one of the most fraught climate change debates by
calling for a rethink of how rich countries can help poorer nations deal with
the effects of global warming.
The
billionaire philanthropist — ranked the world’s richest man — says a new $10bn Green Climate Fund about
to start handing out millions of dollars must focus on the 1.5bn people in poor
farming families who face some of the biggest risks from a changing climate
He has
urged the South Korea-based fund to adopt the “super clear metrics” his Gates
Foundation uses to assess aid requests and look hard at funding
agricultural crop research.
He has
also questioned the long-term impact of some of the first projects the fund is
looking to support with the money that 37 countries have pledged for it since
it was founded at UN talks five years ago.
“This
fund is unique,” the co-founder of Microsoft said in an interview with the
Financial Times, explaining it was the only sizeable source of money that could
potentially help millions of people adapt to the heatwaves, droughts and
flooding that scientists say will be more likely as the atmosphere warms.
He said
one “mind-blowingly underfunded” area was research to make crop seeds more
productive, heat resistant and drought tolerant.
“I’d put
a huge percentage of the money into that,” Mr Gates said.
The Gates
Foundation gives about $100m a year to agricultural research centres around the
world and has met Green Climate Fund staff to discuss such work.
However,
the centres are not among the first batch of eight projects the fund has
shortlisted for approval. Its board is due to consider them at a meeting in
Zambia next month.
The
projects include a $23.6m plan to manage climate-induced water shortages in the
Maldives, an effort Mr Gates said may
mean “you’re going to have to spend this $23m again and again and again”.
Money
spent improving a relatively small number of seed types used by poor farmers
for crops such as cassava and sorghum would have an enduring global benefit, he
said.
“Then
you’re affecting literally hundreds of millions of farmers,” he said. “Once you
do the R&D, that seed is there every year.”
Mr Gates
said he was not proposing the Green Climate Fund back genetically modified
crops, which are contentious in many countries. Rather, he wants more support
for conventional breeding techniques that can significantly enhance farmers’
yields.
Héla
Cheikhrouhou, executive director of the Green Climate Fund, welcomed Mr Gates’s
suggestion, adding he and his foundation were “an inspiration”.
Because
the fund is only just starting to operate, it is going to be “learning by
doing”, but it does have a rigorous set of criteria for assessing applications,
she said.
Although
agricultural research centres have not yet been formally accredited for fund
support, this is likely to change in future and vulnerable farmers are very
much a focus of the fund’s work, she added.
They
would be helped by some of the fund’s eight shortlisted projects, including an
early warning weather forecasting system in Malawi and a salinised land
restoration plan in Senegal.
Mr Gates,
whose net worth is just under $80bn, declared in June he would double his
personal investment in innovative green
technologies to $2bn in the next five years.
That move raised eyebrows in the lead-up to the December UN meeting in Paris that is due to strike a new climate change accord, and his latest comments are likely to attract more attention.
The UN
climate talks have been overshadowed by controversy over whether wealthy
countries will meet a vow to deliver $100bn a year in climate funding from
public and private sources to poorer nations by 2020.
The Green
Climate Fund has been at the centre of the debate because it is expected to
help channel much of the $100bn.
Poorer
countries want the fund to help them adapt to the impact of global warming and
half its money will be directed to such work.
The rest
will go to systems that cut greenhouse gas emissions, such as renewable power
or energy efficiency projects, efforts many rich nations favour.
No comments:
Post a Comment